Laserfiche WebLink
Member Boerigter said the future variances may be a concern. The hardship was created by the <br />property owner. A specific finding or record should be made for variance requests on this site in <br />the future. <br />Chair Traynor explained that additional conditions should he added; but he was concerned with <br />traffic and enforceability of conditions to be used in the future. <br />There were no further comments. Chair Traynor closed the hearing <br />Motion: Member Bake�a�a.an moved, seconded by Member Boerigter, to recommend approval of <br />an 892 s.f. lot size variance to Section 1004.016 (Residential Dimensional Requirements) for <br />new Parcel'B" for property located at 1822 Dale Court based on the findings in Section 5 of the <br />project report, finding that Parcel B is buildable even with its odd shape and the hardships are the <br />responsibilities of the owner, and subject to the conditions within Section 6 of the project report <br />dated August 3,2005, including an additional condition: a permit shall be required for:��,r fence <br />regardless of height. Staff is to review landscape plans at the time of the building permit. <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 1 <br />Motion carried: 5-� <br />Motion: Member Bakeman moved, seconded by Member White, to recommend approval of a <br />minor subdivision (Three Parcel Minor Subdivision (City Code Section i 104.04E} creating one <br />new parcel ('B'� with a parcel size of 1 l, 608 �. f. thereby reducing the size of existing Parcel <br />"A" to 15,514 s.f. for property located at 1822 Dale Court, based on the findings in Section 5 and <br />subject to the conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated August 3,2005, including an <br />additional condition: a permit shall be required for �n�� fence regardless of height. Staff is to <br />review landscape plans at the time of the building permit. <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 1 <br />Motion carried. 5-1 <br />RCA P�'3655{0$2205) - Page 10 of 12 <br />