My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0912_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0912_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:41:26 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:04:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
198
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting — 08/22/05 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 12 <br />revised the original motion, and Kough seconded the <br />modification to postpone action and send the request back <br />to the Planning Commission for their recommendation. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Ihlan; Schroeder; Kough and Maschka. <br />Nays: Klausing. <br />Motion Adopted. <br />Further discussion ensued regarding whether to provide <br />public notice regarding the Planning Commission <br />consideration of the request; with consensus of the City <br />Council that additional public notice would not be required <br />and was not intended as part of the motion. <br />4.d Approve Dennis Guptil's Final PUD, 185 McCarrons <br />Boulevard (PF 3575) (former Consent Item 3.h) <br />At the request of Mayor Klausing, City Planner Thomas <br />Paschke briefly reviewed this request. <br />Ihlan moved to postpone consideration of this request to a <br />future meeting; opining she had several items for <br />discussion that she could submit to staff in writing, related <br />to a senior housing condominium complex; no site line <br />plan; parking issues; and the Park Dedication fee; for all of <br />which she would like additional information prior to voting <br />on the matter. <br />City Planner Paschke advised that, since preparation of the <br />Staff Report, most of the items had been resolved: payment <br />in lieu of the park dedication fee approved by the Parks and <br />Recreation Commission at $1,000 per unit; parking lot <br />lighting; the common practice for the proposal not to have <br />a photometric plan at this time, but required to meet City <br />code. <br />Councilmem�er Ihlan provided additional detail to her <br />objections for approval at this time of the request, without <br />further information being provided, noting the sufficient <br />time frame available for consideration and action. <br />Ordinance 1325 <br />Dennis Guptil <br />Final PUD <br />18511�cCarrons Bv <br />(PF 3575) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.