My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0912_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0912_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:41:26 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:04:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
198
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting — 08/22/OS <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 33 <br />eliminate any leftovers ��-o�n storage. <br />City Attorney Anderson noted the intent of Mr. Pratt to <br />encourage the contractor to fmd a market for used equipment and <br />to remove it. <br />Page 23, Section 6.03, Marketing Agreements <br />Councilmember Schroeder questioned why the City was <br />concerned with the contractor's marketing agreements if he was <br />certifying the materials were marketable. Councilmember <br />Schroeder noted that Sections 7.01 and 7.06 on page 25 dealt <br />with the san�e thing. <br />Mr. Pratt noted that this was in reference to the revenue-sharing <br />portion of the contract. <br />City Attorney Anderson noted that this provided additional <br />enforcement, referencing paragraph 7, to make certification and <br />copies of the contracts required. <br />Councilmember Schroeder noted another typographical error on <br />the last paragraph of page 23, "meeting." <br />Page 29, Section 8.04, Revenue Sharing <br />Cou�c�lmen�Uer Schroeder suggesting tying that paragraph closer <br />to Section 6.03 (Marketing Agreements). <br />City Attorney Anderson noted that Section 6 dealt with annual <br />reporting, and the format of the RFP was better served with <br />Section 6 as a separate section, rather than including it in this <br />area related to Payment and Damages. <br />When questioned where the revenue sharing funds would be <br />applied, Mr. Pratt advised that this would be a future Council <br />discussion for their determination and direction. <br />Council consensus was to include Revenue Sharing discussion <br />on a future Study Session agenda. <br />Page 31, Section 8.05, Liquidated Damages <br />City Attorney Anderson spolce in support of defining as many <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.