Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meetir�g — 08122/p5 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 34 <br />liquidated damages as possible for the City's benefit in putting <br />prospective contractors on notice of the City's expectations. <br />Mr. Pratt addressed ����r�-�ezc�us issues related to missed walk up <br />collections and the frustration of residents when this occurred; <br />and the need to entice drivers to perform their duties. <br />Mr. Pratt also noted tl-�� �otential for designing a program to <br />effectively meet the City's needs (i.e., tonnage collected versus <br />collection points). <br />Section 8.05, d), Throwing or Dropping Containers <br />Caunc�lmembez Schroeder questioned how to enforce this <br />section; and ca��tio��.ed that residents may use this to make a <br />contractor look bad. <br />Page 32, i) <br />It was Council consensus to remove item i) "Failure to maintain <br />vehicle in manner which prevents nuisances such as leaky seals <br />or hydraulics." <br />Page 37, Section 9.07, Governing Law <br />Cou�acilmenlUe1- Sclaroeder questioned whether the contractor <br />should have a clause allowing him to terminate the contract. <br />City Attorney Anderson questioned if the City wanted such a <br />clause with tl�e potential for no service provider. <br />Page 41, Section 9.22, Contract Conditions <br />After discussion of tl�c provisions in a), b) and c), and comment <br />by City Attorney Anderson, it was determined that this section <br />would remain as worded, allowing the City to draft the contract, <br />not the contrac�o�-. <br />Staff was directed to i�nplement those discussed revisions into <br />the draft RF'�'. <br />Jennefer HIennert, Public Sector Manager, Waste <br />Management <br />Ms. Klennert provided a written statement from Waste <br />Management dated August 22, 2005, outlining the firm's <br />