My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_1017_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_1017_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 2:59:15 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:09:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Department Approval <br />�#� �� � � � r� <br />��7 f � � ,1 <br />Ft�quc�� t�r Council Action <br />Manager Approval <br />�� � <br />Item Description <br />Back rg ound <br />Date: October 17, 2005 <br />Item Number: 3• <br />Agenda Section <br />Council Consideration of City Prosecutor Proposals <br />The City Council directed staff to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) to metro law firms for <br />City Prosecutor legal services. The City sent the RFP to 33 law firms and placed an ad on the <br />League of Minnesota Cities website. Eight law firms returned proposals. Chief Carol Sletner, <br />Sgt. Loren Rosand, Sgt. Randy Johnson, Building Official Don Munson and Communications <br />Specialist Carolyn Gurti reviewed the proposals and selected three law firms, Jensen, Bell, <br />Converse and Erickson; Hellmuth & Johnson; and Ratwik, Roszak and Maloney to interview. <br />Staff describes in the table format our evaluation of the law firms interviewed. The evaluations <br />are based on the written proposals submitted by the law firms and the oral interviews that were <br />conducted on September 29,2005. The interviews were conducted by staff listed above. <br />Evaluation Criteria lrnsen, F��!]��r,3u�li � Ratwik, <br />� �a�7 k��rse �u,�k J �hn�n Roszak and <br />. Eri�k���s Maloney <br />Qualifications of Firm -- Experience wl '�� �� 25 <br />similar municipal service, depth of � <br />experience w/i firm � <br />(30 possible) <br />Qualifications of Assigned Personnel -- � � [! <br />Experience w� similar municipal service, <br />education/training <br />(30 possible) � <br />Availability to Provide Timely Service <br />(20 possible) <br />Conflict of Interest <br />(20 possible) <br />Total Points Earned <br />(100 possible) <br />���-- --� <br />�� <br />' �{� <br />20 <br />I�U �� <br />� <br />77 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.