My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_1024_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_1024_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 10:41:37 AM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:09:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
337
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting — IO/1U/05 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page � 0 <br />John Kysylyczyn, 3083 N Victoria Street <br />Mr. Kysylyczyn suggested an "Option E;" and questioned the <br />inflation comments addressed in the City Manager Memo to the <br />City Council dated October 5, 2005. Mr. Kysylyczyn provided <br />his perspective to specific items throughout the memo (i.e., non- <br />inflationary new spending; Police Captain's position; take hoine <br />squad cars; and health care and energy costs related to inflation). <br />Mr. Kysylyczyn opined that the reductions in departments over <br />the last several years was due to the normal course of business <br />and increased technology; and that while the City may claim to <br />have a lower tax rate than similar cities of the same size, it had a <br />significant reliance on user charges. <br />A1 Sands, 2612 Aldine <br />Mr. Sands spoke in support of the new "Option D" provided by <br />the City Manager, as requested by the City Council, and opined <br />that it was a workable option. Mr. Sands reviewed the most <br />recent tax levy year, and the skyrocketing values of residential <br />properties. <br />There were no further public comments. <br />Mayor Klausing questioned the logic of Councilmembers Ihlan <br />and Kough in supporting a 5% levy increase, rather than a 6.9% <br />levy increase to fund new obligations and not depend on <br />reserves. <br />Discussion ensued regarding rationale of individual <br />Councilmembers and percentage of levy increases they were <br />willing to support; Consumer Price Indexing and how it related <br />to internal escalating costs. <br />Councilmember Ihlan supported the 5% levy increase to avoid <br />double-digit Ievy increases to the taxpayers for two years in a <br />row, opining it was unfair. <br />Councilmember Maschka noted that current inflation rates are <br />estimated at 2.6% and 3% for the year, but didn't account for <br />energy and housing; noting that gross inflation would probably <br />increase by 3% just this month, and that the economy was <br />moving into an inflationary period. Councilmember Maschka <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.