2005_1121_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

a. Possible Action Steps: - evaluated annually for implementation within budget resources i. Explore the development of architectural guidelines (a book or brochure of examples) for new it��ll single family development and for home additions that add a second floor. ii. Evaluate funding sources to provide architectural assistance (or critiques) to applicants of iz��Il and second floor additions to ensure that plans blend within the existing character of the neighborhood. 4. Policy Statement: Achieve a balance between families with school-aged children and seniors in multifamily housing and the appropriate distribution of acceptable units that are affordable and comvatible with each uniaue lifestvle. i. Increase opportunities for Young Family Housing through the funding of the Senior Housing Regeneration Program (SHRP) a:�d evaluation of add�tiona� a�ew small lot sin�le famalv sites, — Provided funding in 2005 for SHI2P ii. Recommend that the Planning Commission evaluate the ,�.... . benefits and drawbacks of reduein� the e�stin� reauired �'- lot size to allow for more affordable small lot si��1e familv in�l� develop�ent (similar to Applewood). 23 On September 12,2005 the City of Roseville received its 2005 System Statement (see attachment"A") from the MetropolitanCounciL When issued, the Statementbecomes the starting point for the required 2008 Roseville Comprehensive Plan update. This Statement, based on the 1998 Plan, seeks an increase in housing which translates into increased density. For Roseville tklis has meant a population increase from 34,500 (2000) to 37,000 (2030) and a housing unit increase from 15,500 (2000) to 17,500 (2030). Growth Management: The Regional Development Frameworksets an overall minimum residential density standard of 3— S units per acre in developed and developingareas where urban service is located or � anne . e avet�age minimum standard of3 units aer acre is irrtportantto the e�czent use of regional systems, including wastewater system investments. Communities that significrxnt�dy over-size or under-size regional svstems can cause inef�iciencies in the use of regional resources. Additionally, �rt�� rr� housin� at these ��1+y� levels may help communities meet their obligations under the MetropolitanLand PlanningAd to plan and address their housing needs (page 2, MetropolitanCouncil System Statement Letter dated September 12, 2005). PF3b96 RCA_I 12105,dac Page 4 of 7