My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_1128_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_1128_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 4:04:43 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:10:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
280
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting —11/14/OS <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 8 <br />_ Community Development Director Dennis Welsch advised <br />— that records of the City and Consulting firm indicated that a <br />— previous payment had not been received; thus the previous <br />— payment had been voided; and another check issued. Mr. <br />Welsch indicated that the professional services were for the <br />ongoing work on the "Roseville Past, Present and Future" <br />program during 2005 and 2006 in anticipation of the <br />updated Comprehensive Plan. <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned when the City Council <br />had approved those Consulting services, opining that it was <br />her impression that the services were "free of charge." <br />Mr. Welsch advised that the services were part of the <br />professional services of the Community Development <br />Department; and opined that staff didn't convey to the <br />Council that the services were without charge. <br />Councilmember Kough expressed similar concerns related <br />to Twin Lakes Redevelopmentitems. <br />Mayor Klausing suggested future discussion as to City <br />Council involvement in consulting fees in the Community <br />Development budget. <br />Mr. Welsch advised that the fees were part of the 2005 <br />Budget, and offered for staff to come before the City <br />Council prior to hiring consulting services for the 2006 <br />budget, if directed to do so by the City Council. <br />Related to the TIF District No. 17 payments to �.rass <br />Monroe, Councilmember Ihlan questioned what <br />development activity would substantiate current charges. <br />Mr. Welsch advised that the payments were on September <br />invoices; that the items had been tabled several times by <br />Councilmembers, and they were coming back to the <br />Council in final form (i.e., financial analysis, term sheet, <br />and appraisals) and were dollars that were reimbursable by <br />the developer once the Council approved their payment and <br />processing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.