Laserfiche WebLink
��.�' Who should staff this effort? As noted above, building inspection services are now at <br />capacity and will be for years. Staff is suggesting that the HI�A review the possibility of <br />contracting for the inspection services through an outside agency or company. A <br />"Request for Proposal" (RFP) has been sent to approximately40 private housing <br />inspectors with a deadline of December 15`. In addition, staff is contacting other cities to <br />review the possibility of partnering for the services. Other area Cities with programs and <br />staff include Shoreview, New Brig�Ztan or Mounds View. Whoever the new inspectors <br />are, they will need access to existing records within both the city's planning and building <br />inspection files and a check list process wouldbe establishedto ensure uniformity in <br />inspection requirements. <br />�� How will the pro�ram be funded? Staff estimates that the cost to implement and <br />operate the program would require between $50,000 to $80,000 expenditure annually <br />depending upon the strueture. (This does not include legal fees needed to gain compliance <br />through court actions.) The �RA has included this implementation and operating <br />cost amount in their 2006 budget to be funded by a Council approved HRA levy. <br />Staff estimates that contracting for this service through private inspection services or <br />partnering with other communities may reduce the cost by approximately 40°/o or less. <br />� r� Possible Fee Structure: The cost of the new program will be partially offset by fees paid <br />by rental owners. Using Ramsey County data for single family non-homestead properties, <br />plus duplexes, triplexes and fourplexes, there are an estimated450 units subject to annual <br />licensing. Using the average fee per unit charged by other communities of $50 per unit <br />with an 80°/o collection rate, a total of approximately $18,000 could be collected in fees. <br />At best, this revenue could support 40- 50 percent of the estimated annual cost for the <br />program. Any fees collected as part of the program would directly offset the costs of <br />administering the program — first to cover inspection services, second to cover internal <br />administration and third to cover uncollected legal fees or abatement costs associated <br />with properties that do not comply with the ordinance. <br />}.�:� Process: <br />�. : The City Attorney, Police Chief, Building Official, Community Development Director, <br />Codes Officials, Planning Commission and HRA. have reviewed and approved of the <br />draft ordinances. As with any new program, it is likely that slight modifications and <br />changes would be recommended throughout the year if the ordinances are adopted and <br />implemented as presented. <br />5. � Staff presented the draft ordinances to the City Council on October 24th for comment, <br />suggestions, input. Council designated November 28" as a public hearing to gain input <br />from rental property owners and residents. <br />5.'� Notice of the public hearing was published, a news fax article was completed and mailed <br />notice was sent to suspected rental property owners who would be affected by the rental <br />licensing ordinance. <br />RCA_ Rental Licensing &Property Maintenance Public Hearing (ll-28-OS) - Page 4 of 5 <br />