Laserfiche WebLink
l Jim Sa�er�.�d, 1033 Shryer, is opposed and expressed concern about privacy and wildlife. Stay <br />� away from back property lines. The woods from Victoriato Lexington Avenue are a"highway <br />� for deer". The trees on the back of the lots will be removed and will destroy the animal flow <br />� through the wild. <br />6 Member poherty asked if the owners of existing lots could build homes or accessory buildings to <br />� the back of the lot? (Yes) <br />� Angie Franks, 985 Parker, explained that the quality of new development by Ron Anderson is <br />1�i high. The change is good, bringing in new younger families and improving property values. <br />l l The proposal will improve this neighborhood. However, Parker Avenue traffic from the Baptist <br />l� Church is a significant issue. <br />l3 <br />l �4 <br />l� <br />I� <br />S� <br />]S <br />]9 <br />Kevin Vesldahl, 960 Parker, had a plan to build at the back of the lot until worl�ing with Ron <br />Anderson. <br />Andrew Stark, 1009 Parker, noted the lots proposed are small (30 feet between homes) and kids <br />will play in the street. He prefers four new homes on Parker. <br />�� Dave �'este1,1080 Parker, asked if a speed bump or stop sign could be put on their road. Motor <br />�] bil{es are an issue. Could the city create a"green zone" or thin park along the adjoining rear <br />�� property lines? Could there be a trail down the rear lot lines or a connector to existing parks? <br />�, �i <br />�� Wilbert Pa,.�:is��; 1404 Parker, explained that he is concernee�..�b�ut sanitary sewer r� ��; ���i l} . Can <br />�� <br />�� <br />�7 <br />2� <br />2� <br />3� <br />31 <br />3� <br />�^ <br />.� � <br />�� <br />3 f� <br />3� <br />�� <br />3� <br />�� <br />�I <br />�� <br />�� <br />�=� <br />�� <br />�6 <br />this syster��handle 10 extra homes? The city has an easerrzen� on his property. He has a storm <br />sewer on his site as well. <br />Bill Marn�ish, 2054 N. Lexington, said he bought the property thinking the land would remain as <br />is. The green spaces (public or private) are unique and should be preserved. <br />Michelle Flickinger,1027 Shryer, expressed concern about wildlife and privacy. Codes are <br />guidelines to her. How can the beauty of the neighborhood be written into a code. Privacy and <br />landscaping is a significant issue. How will kids cut through from the cul-de-sac to Shryer to the <br />Pioneer Park? Could fencing be added? Traffic on Shryer has increased dramatically. Could <br />there be less than 10 homes? <br />Chair Traynnr thanked the developed for trying to work with the neighbors. He asked Ron <br />Anderson what the plans are for the south property line and what the landscape plan will be. He <br />will attempt to retain as many trees as possible. <br />Member White asked Mr. Anderson if five new homes �er�.��£E�9�. (not financiallyfeasible. <br />The homes will be 1,800 — 2,600 SF and $500,000 to $750,000 each. <br />Hearing no further public comment, Chair Trayz�aar closed the public hearing. <br />� ���° <br />