Laserfiche WebLink
1 Member poherty said he supports the project as being similar to the Iona Lane subdivision <br />? which is an asset to the neighborhood. There will be many empty nesters who move into this <br />r project. The same concerns were expressed about the Iona Lane site. There are no complaints <br />� now. These will be very nice homes. The drainage plan will be followed. <br />� <br />�i Member Boerigter also supported the project. These are private property rights issues. The <br />� project will benefit the city in total. The city needs more expensive homes. <br />� <br />� Member White supports the project. Other projects could also occur on Parker based on current <br />F� codes. He likes the "green zone" concept, prefers 5 new homes. The homes may bring in new <br />I C families to the city. <br />l� <br />1� <br />1 �i <br />1� <br />1� <br />17 <br />]K <br />1� <br />�Q <br />�� <br />��' <br />23 <br />�� <br />25 <br />��+ <br />�? <br />�� <br />�� <br />3 [� <br />31 <br />3� <br />�a <br />3� <br />3� <br />�� <br />�7 <br />�� <br />3� <br />�1} <br />Member Wozniak supported the project as per comments of Members Boerigter and White. He <br />would like more open green space retained into the project or linked to other parks. This project <br />will be a benefit to the neighborhood— the city and the developer should work on existing traffic <br />issues. <br />Chair Txaynar explained that traffic can be managed minimally. Deb Bloom explained this is a <br />state-aid street. The big issue is driver behavior, an enforcement issue. She explained some of <br />the deterrents. <br />Chair Traynpr supportedthe project, but not enthusiastically, because of the neighborhood <br />character. However, the project is consistent with the citywide plan. Conditions could be placed <br />or, the property. <br />Chair Travnor's conditions: <br />1) F�uff �ri n� of traffic and lights to neighboringproperties <br />2) Drainage plan to use BMP to maintain rain gardens and infiltration containments <br />3) E_��i��c:��a� and drainage plan must protect adjoining properties <br />Motion: Member Bakeman moved, seconded by Member poherty, to recommend <br />approval of the preliminary plat, Birch Park, allowing the creation of 10 single family <br />residential lots over 3.73 acres, including a public road and utilities (sanitary sewer and <br />water) from the 31ots currently addressed as 952,960, and 978 Parker Avenue, based on <br />t�� comments of Section 4 and conditions of Section 5 of the project report dated October <br />5,2005. Member Balce�nan read the conditions within the report (and additions) to be included: <br />The Developer work with City Staff to develop a grading, drainage, utility and final <br />tree preservation and landscape plan. <br />�] 2. Birch Park will be responsible for a park dedication requirement. Staff assumes that a <br />�? payment in lieu of land dedication will be required amounting to $1,000 per net new lot. <br />�� The method of park dedication (land or fee) must be reviewed by the Park & Recreation <br />��-� Commission and a recommendation included in the final action by the City Council. <br />�� <br />�6 3. The Commission by unanimous consent agreed to add conditions as follows: <br />��� � <br />