My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_1205_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_1205_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 2:04:27 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:10:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting —11/28/OS <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 18 <br />with inspections, but expressed her perception that a strong <br />prejudice was apparent to single-family homes being examined <br />annually, but not multi-family units. Ms. Albert opined that this <br />set up onerous competition for her that was unnecessary; given <br />the current rental housing market. Ms. Albert voiced a lack of <br />confidence that the rental £e� would remain at $50, but would <br />increase and perhaps cause her to consider incentives to work <br />with state agencies for housing (�.e., Section 8) to consider <br />renters not contributing to society. <br />�arre�l S�il�ing,1937 Roseda�e Drive <br />Mr. S1�i11ing's primary concerns were with off-street parking for <br />rental properties and yard maintenance; citing the example of the <br />next door single-family, two-bedroom home currently used as a <br />rental with an additional 3 college students housed in the <br />basement. Mr. Skilling reviewed the problem with outside <br />maintenance, parking congestion, and safety of basement <br />bedrooms. <br />Cliff Benson, 582 Sexton Avenue W <br />Mr. Benson requested that, when regulations are written, they be <br />strong enough to enforce the things needing enforcement. Mr. <br />Benson cited a home behind his property that faces County Road <br />B-2 that was being used as a rental following the neighbor's <br />demise and transfer to a nursing home; with a 30-year old, <br />dilapidated cedar fence; planking covering a defunct swimming <br />pool with water ponding in the pool, creating a health and safety <br />hazard. <br />Richard Houck,1131 Rose�awn Avenue <br />Mr. Hauck sought justification for the proposed code, based on <br />staff s listing of violations; and sought documentation of the <br />actual number of violations in 1-4 unit rentals. Mr. Houcl� <br />opined that this proposal was clearly discriminatory; that all <br />rentals needed to be inspected, or none. Mr. Houck �u�ther <br />opined that such a code implementation would adversely impact <br />rents and marketability of smaller rental units; and that owner- <br />occupied units should be excluded. Mr. Houck expressed <br />concern that he had not been advised of any neighborhood <br />meetings where this issue was discussed. Mr. Houck opined that <br />this was one more intrusion of government into small business. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.