My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_1219_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_1219_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 2:56:06 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:11:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting —12/OS/OS <br />URAF'I` Minutes - Page 6 <br />a. Tim Collins, 2781 Fernwaod Street <br />Mr. Collins referenced his 2006 tax statement and the <br />double-digit increases for homeowners, even with the City's <br />proposed levy increase of 7.5%; and questioned the <br />correlation of commercial and residential properties and <br />their valuations. <br />Councilmember Maschka explained recent state legislation <br />for equalization of property tax rate calculations on market <br />values for commercial and residential properties and <br />impacts to residential properties. <br />Councilmember Ihlan noted that the City Council needed to <br />be aware of impacts to residential properties from other <br />jurisdictions and market values, in addition to the City levy, <br />when finalizing the proposed tax levy. <br />b. Dan Cartier, 2917 Hillsview East <br />Mr. Cartier sought clarification from Mr. Miller on several <br />graphs used representing average marl�et values and home <br />costs in the City of Roseville. <br />Mr. Miller clarified that the average home value in <br />Roseville was approximately $185,000. <br />City Manager Beets advised that the property tax statements <br />represented Ramsey County assessor figures, not actual <br />market value of homes. <br />Mr. Ca�-tier sought further clarification on the actual <br />compensation amounts referenced on Mr. Miller's <br />presentation, and their actual representation (z.�., wages <br />andlar pension benefits). <br />Mr. Miller noted that the figures represented all personnel- <br />related expenses: wages, City contributions for health care <br />— and pensions; and that the total cost of personnel expenses <br />included general inflation for all service inputs, not just <br />labor, as well as employee wage steps. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.