Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting —12/OS/OS <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 22 <br />Mayor Klausing spoke in favor of the motion, addressing <br />drainage and traffic concerns that could be monitored andlor <br />enforced; the rights of property owners not subject to popular <br />vote; original intent of the Vista 2000 report in preventing <br />industrial intrusion into residential areas; and the compatibility of <br />the proposed single-family homes in the neighborhood. <br />Councilmember Maschka opined that this had been a difficult <br />issue for him to deal with considering property rights and the <br />right to develop private property. Councilmember Maschka <br />concurred with the Planning Commission and staff that, as the <br />rules were laid out, Mr. Anderson's use is conforming. <br />Councilmember Maschka further opined that if the City Council <br />were to tum down the request, he was convinced that Mr. <br />Anderson could and would receive a favorable court ruling to <br />proceed. Councilmember Maschka recognized the City's <br />ongoing issues with infill housing and changing the makeup of <br />existing neighborhoods. Councilmember Maschka expressed his <br />discomfort with the density of this proposal; supported Mr. <br />Anderson's right to develop the property; expressed concern in <br />potentially dividing neighborhoods; but spoke in support of the <br />motion. <br />Councilmember Maschka reiterated the immediate need for the <br />community to look at infi1l redevelopment in the city and how it <br />fits in; and to determine how to preserve large lots without taking <br />away from other property owners in order to fmd a solution. <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke against the motion; once again <br />reading a portion of the ordinance language providing City <br />Council power to maintain health, welfare, general safety or <br />convenience of its residents. Councilmember Ihlan recognized <br />Mr. Anderson's right to develop his property, but sought a <br />balance with other neighborhood interests; and opined that the <br />only property rights being protected tonight were those of Mr. <br />Anderson and that the other neighborhood homeowners didn't <br />count. Councilmember Ihlan expressed her frustration in the <br />Council majority's "pro developer" support; lack of interest in <br />reviewing ordinances to ensure lots aren't subdivided; and efforts <br />to preserve woodlands and wetland areas. <br />