My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_1219_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_1219_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 2:56:06 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:11:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
privacyof the tenants. Knowing the numbersof individualswithin a rental <br />� unit is important to enforce limits on overcrowding and accurately address <br />.} the numerouscomplaintsweget conceming overcrowding. A/so, having the <br />� head-of-household identified helps save staff time researching these <br />� <br />� <br />�, <br />� <br />� fx_ <br />�� <br />I �l <br />II <br />1� <br />I� <br />I� <br />individuals and their phone numbersand therefore keeps costs down for the <br />cityby enablingstaff to addressand reso/ve complaintsmore quickly. <br />907.28: second sentence: Requirement that utility services be maintained in <br />the name of the property owner? Staff response - Without thisprovision <br />property owners sometimes make city billing s ta ff the defacto landlord in <br />trying to resolve billing dr'sputes Under the City Code, the property owner is <br />responsible for water andsewer charges to the property. The proposed <br />provision in the rental ordinance is consistent with the City Code. <br />]� 7. 907.15: What happens under state law or this ordinance if the rental <br />]�} property owner fails to designate a local agent, fails to maintain the local <br />1�' agent, or fails to update the city with information about the local agent? <br />]� Increase to the 13-county area. StaffResponse - Theycoulc�bein violation <br />]{� o f the ordinance and, after wamings, could be justification for revocation of <br />?�J the license - this violation could be a misdemeanor. The local agent range <br />'?1 could increase to the 13-countymetro area. <br />�t <br />�� $, 907.13: Three violations based upon tenant actions would leave the owner in <br />�� an economic disadvantage while they try to evict. Property could be vacant <br />�� f o r some ti m e due t o these issues. Staff Response - The City (Councilor <br />�6 HRA) couldprovide a waiver on penalty if the owner is making agood faith <br />�'� effort to resolve the issuesand evict the problem tenants who have broken <br />2�l <br />�� <br />� [� <br />the law. A/so, the city could provide owners with better tenantscreening <br />methods so the issue does not reoccur. <br />a I 9. 907.12: Violation is subject to fine & imprisonment. This is too harsh. Staff <br />�� Response - This is standard compliance language used by cities to encourage <br />�� consistent violatorsand onlyalwaysusedasa last resort method The act of <br />.}� writing a citation is not a fine or imprisonment Court citations are written <br />�� when there is an impasse between the city and a property owner over an <br />�r� issue; the property owner disagrees with the city's position or action. A court <br />,}'� citation means the issue in dispute is then taken before an impartialparty (a <br />�� judge) for an impartial determination. Judges are typicallyinterested in <br />�5� resolving issues, not handing out punishment. The threat of a fine and/or <br />�� imprisonmentis usedby a judge as an incentive but usually only results when <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.