Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, August 24, 2009 <br />Page 8 <br />Mayor Klausing expressed his understanding that fees must show a direct correla- <br />tion between that being charged and actual cost for providing the service, and not <br />allowing for flexibility such as found in the General Levy; and that it made sense <br />to have those fees off to the side. <br />Mr. Miller noted the rationale of both Councilmember Roe's and Mayor Klaus- <br />ing's observations, advising that there was so much emphasis placed on levy- <br />supported programs due to statutory requirements, and no such provision for per- <br />mits/fees, and until there was more of a comfort level with the BFO process, it <br />may be prudent to break down the various items. <br />Councilmember Pust expressed her confusion, while attempting to remain open- <br />minded, in how to use the information provided by staff in ranking programs and <br />services, without additional expertise provided by various departments in those <br />programs that are vital and/or inter-related. <br />Mayor Klausing shared Councilmember Pust's confusion, noting that the City <br />Council was floundering as to how to best proceed; without the historical context <br />and tradition of a City Manager-recommended budget and the City Council's re- <br />action to that recommendation and subsequent adjustments. Mayor Klausing <br />noted the difficulty in the natural process previously used for apart-time City <br />Council and citizen perspective, and reliance on the City's professional staff and <br />priority needs. <br />City Manager Malinen noted that the BFO process was challenging for all in- <br />volved, and would take several months to process all expenses, even that portion <br />identified as tax-supported. Mr. Malinen opined that it was unfortunate that the <br />Springsted report was not available tonight; however, noted that the City Council <br />could continue the process without that documentation at this time as they set <br />their not-to-exceed Preliminary Levy; and that the process would come after the <br />Springsted presentation. Mr. Malinen noted the need to address new obligations <br />in 2010 that will require additional funding via additional tax levy, or reduction or <br />elimination of other programs, with varying impacts and ramifications, to balance <br />the budget. However, Mr. Malinen noted that, even without the Springsted pres- <br />entation, there was a certain amount of base budgeting that could be determined <br />based on 2009 levels, including additional specific information to be provided <br />later in tonight's meeting by staff that will affect the budget. Mr. Malinen noted <br />staff's request that Councilmembers provide staff with information on where they <br />were most comfortable with a Preliminary, not Final, 2010 Levy percentage. <br />Councilmember Pust interpreted City Manager Malinen's comments to mean that <br />the City Council set the highest levy possible, without sufficient information or <br />the promise of that information at a later date, and many unknowns (i.e., em- <br />ployee health costs, and fuel costs). <br />