My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_0914
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_0914
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2009 9:52:32 AM
Creation date
9/28/2009 9:52:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/14/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, September 14, 2009 <br />Page 21 <br />Councilmember Pust opined that there was not need for discussion at this point; <br />anticipating that the inconsistencies would be worked out through the zoning code <br />update. <br />Mr. Trudgeon advised that, those items of confusion or inconsistency, would be <br />part of the overall policy discussion and zoning code update, with the exception of <br />recreational vehicle issues that were unrelated to zoning code issues. Mr. Trudg- <br />eon suggested, if it was the Council's intent to discuss recreational vehicles, that <br />more notice be provided to the public for their comment and allowing staff to <br />draft some responses for consideration in that discussion. <br />Councilmember Pust suggested that, specific to recreational vehicles, Council- <br />members prepare a proposal for further discussion. <br />Councilmember Ihlan commented on impervious surface requirements, opining <br />that she could not support any increases to impervious surfaces above the current <br />30%, and would be supportive of decreasing that percentage with more creative <br />applications. Councilmember Ihlan commented on Planned Unit Development <br />(PUD) issues, that consideration be given to the order of approval; and referenced <br />a former Roseville Citizens League study that should be reviewed, and that the <br />application procedures and process be clarified. <br />Mr. Trudgeon, from staff's perspective, suggested that approval be done later in <br />the process, noting the automatic triggers in place for comprehensive plan <br />amendment, while cautioning the need to keep the public informed at the General <br />Concept level to allow for full transparency. <br />Councilmember Roe observed that the various issues would go through the Plan- <br />ning Commission process prior to City Council; with hearings held at that level to <br />glean the Commission's expertise, and their recommendations. <br />14. City Manager Future Agenda Review <br />City Manager Malinen reviewed upcoming tentative meeting agendas. <br />15. Councilmember-Initiated Items for Future Meetings <br />None. <br />16. Adjourn <br />The meeting was adjourned at approximately 8:50 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.