My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_0914
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_0914
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2009 9:52:32 AM
Creation date
9/28/2009 9:52:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/14/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, September 14, 2009 <br />Page 20 <br />disparity, with staff recognizing the need to rectify that in the future to establish <br />service levels allowing comparisons between departments, as well as with other <br />communities, with the need to allow the BFO process to evolve further over time. <br />Further discussion included service levels and standards; inconsistencies and dif- <br />ferentials in performance measures and cost-effectiveness versus preferred meas- <br />urement of performance outputs and programs; how to achieve an authentic <br />budget prioritization with limited information to-date; need to continue building <br />performance measures for all programs and services city-wide requiring a change <br />in culture and mindset for budget decision-making above and beyond taking last <br />year's budget and adding an inflationary percentage; and not making assumptions <br />that the current budget is the right budget. <br />Councilmember Pust expressed frustration in how to make effective use of the <br />BFO process for the 2010 budget. <br />Mr. Miller noted that staff was open to hearing Council concerns and providing <br />additional information in response to those needs. <br />Councilmember Pust noted that, specific to the Police Department, she was un- <br />able to determine the type of call in correlation to the number of calls in order to <br />address service levels and standards. <br />Councilmember Johnson sought additional information as to when the Springsted <br />representative would be available to represent themselves and their data. <br />Mr. Miller advised that their role was to provide the information; and that they <br />had yet to be formally scheduled for meeting attendance, pending the City Coun- <br />cil's initial reactions. <br />Councilmember Roe opined that hearing from the consultant how they arrived at <br />their numbers and their methodology was critical to the process, in addition to <br />feedback from staff on various questions and to allow educated decision-making <br />on how to allocate resources. Councilmember Roe further opined that the Coun- <br />cil's ability to ask staff questions on how to assign priorities, before those prioriti- <br />zation meeting(s), was necessary to provide a better understanding, and was es- <br />sentially more important that any additional information that the consultant could <br />provide at this point. <br />b. Discussion of Planning and 'Coning Issues <br />Community Development Director Patrick Trudgeon provided a written report as <br />requested on various land use issues; and sought Council direction as to how they <br />preferred to proceed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.