Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, October 19, 2009 <br />Page 11 <br />Councilmember Pust concurred, and noted that the federal and state mandated <br />programs were set, but on city-mandated items, the City had more discretion. <br />Councilmember Pust asked that staff define those items; and asked that Depart- <br />ment Heads review her #2 rankings, as she had categorized those items of which <br />she was not familiar or the description was vague or "other," and asked that they <br />provide additional information for her to further review her rankings under that <br />category. <br />Mayor Klausing asked that individual rankings be provided to Mr. Miller by <br />Wednesday of this week. <br />Councilmember Roe asked that Councilmember Ihlan be advised by staff, due to <br />her absence, of this request as well. <br />Further discussion included ways to compare levels of service, based on staff ex- <br />perience and peer communities; and potential areas of consensus and others re- <br />quiring more lobbying by individual Councilmembers of the entire body to <br />achieve consensus. <br />City Manager Malinen suggested that by using their laptop computers, the City <br />Council may be able to streamline the process and make it more efficient and <br />even make adjustments during the meeting, with staff providing compilations dur- <br />ing the meetings. <br />Mayor Klausing sought Councilmember comment related to discussion of addi- <br />tional funding sources, and potentially lowering the preliminary levy. <br />Councilmember Pust noted that that was the ultimate question, of where the line <br />actually ended, and opined that it may move around considerably over the next <br />few meetings and discussions. <br />Mayor Klausing expressed his interest in finishing this part of the process as soon <br />as possible to invite public comment to see if the public was in agreement with <br />the direction of the City Council. <br />Councilmember Johnson expressed appreciation to staff for their continued avail- <br />ability during this process; and opined that there would be substantial discussion <br />needed related to quality of service issues. <br />Councilmember Roe noted that not every line item had a quality of service asso- <br />ciated with it; and suggested that if the levels of service could be defined and <br />ranked as "high, medium and low," with the priority rankings of 1 through 5, they <br />should start to correspond. <br />