My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_1116
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_1116
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2009 11:20:55 AM
Creation date
12/4/2009 11:20:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/16/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 16, 2009 <br />Page 14 <br />this increase with the current demographic and population levels in Roseville. <br />Mr. Willmus noted that the budget was largely driven and consumed by personnel <br />costs, and suggested that each department be reviewed to see where they had <br />scaled back. Mr. Willmus further addressed the City's recycling program and re- <br />duction in revenue sharing to-date in 2009; and asked if Eureka Recycling has ap- <br />proached the City to renegotiate their contract based on the lack of market de- <br />mand for certain recyclable quantities as addressed Section 5.2 of their contract. <br />City Manager Malinen advised that Eureka had not yet formally approached the <br />City. <br />Dick Houck, Roseville <br />Mr. Houck advised that he took a simplistic approach to the budget: when the <br />economy is up, people spend extra money on extra services; and when the econ- <br />omy was down, the City needed to do the same thing citizens were required to do: <br />to live within your income. Mr. Houck opined that there could not be spending <br />on anything other than essentials; and further opined that no one in the audience <br />would ask for an increase in their income when money was short. <br />Mr. Houck opined that fees are nothing more than taxes; and that even when ap- <br />plied to commercial or retail businesses, those increases trickled down to individ- <br />ual citizens. Mr. Houck opined that the City Council had a moral obligation to <br />keep the budget at close to zero. <br />Gary Grefenberg, 91 Mid Oaks Lane <br />Mr. Grefenberg expressed his pleasure in seeing so many residents from south- <br />west Roseville at tonight's meeting. Mr. Grefenberg agreed with Councilmember <br />Ihlan on the need for line items, and opined that this budget process wasn't very <br />transparent. Mr. Grefenberg opined that overtime was the easiest way to cut <br />budgets, and asked specifically for additional information on overtime costs for <br />all departments. Mr. Grefenberg questioned why the Police Department Admini- <br />stration budget had gone up 46.1 % and a commensurate reduction been realized <br />in the Police Department Patrol budget, with property crimes increasing, while <br />violent crimes had been reduced; and sought justification for cops spending time <br />behind desks rather than in squads or on patrol. Mr. Grefenberg, when asked at <br />the community meetings to rank services, advised that he had ranked the Police <br />Department first, but asked for more detail to justify such a large increase. <br />Mr. Grefenberg asked when salary discussions, union contract re-negotiations, <br />and freezes on discretionary increases would be addressed, even while recogniz- <br />ing that employees are the City's most valuable asset, and was not condoning fir- <br />ing employees; but just seeking additional information to indicate how serious the <br />City was in comparison with other municipalities and their attempts to cut back. <br />Mr. Grefenberg opined that this is the year for being frugal and supported alterna- <br />tive budget processes, while understanding that the process is not perfect, but <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.