CC_Minutes_2009_1116 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, November 16, 2009 Page 13 the instant survey process, while remaining interesting. As a Citizen organization, Mr. Neprash advised that the RCL was disappointed in the participation, but more important were pleased that the opportunity was made available, an opportunity at which many RCL members were able to participate. Mr. Neprash advised that RCL members also had participated in Roseville University, and to a person, were very impressed with the information provided and the commitment to the program by staff; and the RCL strongly recommended that the City continue that program, and recommended attendance of any Roseville resident seeking to know how their City operated. Mr. Neprash, on behalf of the RCL, opined that they were im- pressed with the budget materials included on the City website, with the informa- tion detailed and well-organized, and helpful in understanding the decision- making for a budget process in an understandable manner for residents. In recent conversations with RCL members, Mr. Neprash advised that residents have a high level of confidence in staff and City Councilmembers, and recognized how they had successfully addressed serious issues in the past and expressed con- fident that they would be able to address them now. Mr. Neprash suggested that this may be why it seemed that so relatively few people have become more in- volved in the budget process this year. In conclusion, Mr. Neprash advised that the RCL commends the City for increas- ing its offerings in programs to inform citizens, and urged staff and Councilmem- bers to continue to build on those programs in the future. Bob Willmus Mr. Willmus expressed his desire that citizens could come before the City Coun- cil tonight with detailed recommendations on where to spend money, opining that last year when he served on the City Council, it was majority opinion that the budget process was opaque and lacking in transparency, thus the change in meth- odology to the BFO process. However, Mr. Willmus opined that this was not a BFO process and still lacked transparency in providing the outcomes within the budget summaries. Mr. Willmus confessed that he was at a loss on what to com- ment on; and expressed his hope that more detailed budget information (i.e., line items) would be forthcoming and prove helpful. Mr. Willmus advised that, when looking at summaries to-date, it was his percep- tion that this proposed budget would have a devastating effect on the City's Park and Recreation Deparhnent budget, programs and services. Mr. Willmus noted that there were still shortcomings in staff funding; no funding for outdoor rinks; and expressed his efforts to balance this proposed budget and weigh it against other years. Mr. Willmus noted that between 2003 and 2009, the department's full-time equivalent (FTE) employees had been reduced from approximately 27 to 23; and asked that the City Council balance that with other increases since 2009, using as an example the City's public safety services administration budgets (Fire and Police) and operations increasing by close to 60%. Mr. Willmus questioned