My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_1123
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_1123
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2009 9:08:45 AM
Creation date
12/11/2009 9:08:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/23/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 23, 2009 <br />Page 10 <br />tion, noting that there was no program in the amount of roughly $565,000 in this <br />summary, but that there were 18 different programs within that summary; and that <br />if Councilmembers were seeking a link back to a line item budget, it would take <br />approximately one month to recreate that detail. <br />Councilmember Johnson questioned what staff would prepare for the Truth in <br />Taxation hearing; and what they planned to recreate to tie into the budget summa- <br />ries at the end of the BFO process. <br />Mr. Miller advised that such detail was not presented at the Truth in Taxation <br />hearing level; but would consist of a budget package comparable to previous <br />years; and asked if there was a different presentation that the City Council would <br />like to see this year, that staff needed to hear that sooner rather than later. <br />Councilmember Johnson questioned whether staff was already doing what was <br />being requested by Councilmember Ihlan. <br />Mr. Miller advised that, once the budget was finalized, the detail requested by <br />Councilmember Ihlan, would be completed. However, Mr. Miller advised that he <br />was leery to do that level of detail now, when as an example, the additional <br />$50,000 employee insurance costs for every full-time employee would need to be <br />allocated 160 different ways; and he would prefer to do that allocation only once <br />rather than making those disseminations to a still dynamic document and process. <br />Councilmember Johnson concluded that he was hearing from staff that Council- <br />member Ihlan's request would require substantial additional work and was not in <br />staff's timeline at this time. <br />Mr. Miller concurred with Councilmember Johnson's observation; noting that it <br />could be done, but not within a week. <br />Councilmember Roe asked Mr. Miller how long it would be, once the BFO proc- <br />ess was completed and a final budget determined at the last meeting of the year, <br />before a budget document was published. <br />Mr. Miller estimated two weeks, reminding Councilmembers that at the Decem- <br />ber 21, 2009 meeting, the budget document would still be in wholesale categories, <br />not 160 different ways (i.e., vehicle replacement in four different places; arena re- <br />frigeration in one spot) and didn't represent much in the way of labor intensity; <br />however, Mr. Miller asked that the City Council provide clearer direction before <br />he began the fine-tuning process. <br />Councilmember Roe suggested that, through the BFO process, the ultimate budget <br />document will not be the same as in past years. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.