My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_1123
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_1123
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2009 9:08:45 AM
Creation date
12/11/2009 9:08:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/23/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 23, 2009 <br />Page 9 <br />several iterations being aprogram-based as opposed to an operating-based proc- <br />ess. <br />Councilmember Pust expressed concern that City Manager Malinen had not di- <br />rected Mr. Miller to prepare the information requested by Councilmember Ihlan, <br />given that this is a new process with various glitches; and expressed further con- <br />cern that if a City Councilmember couldn't request data as previously provided, <br />what else was not being followed. Councilmember Pust opined that this was not a <br />good path to pursue, and spoke in support of the motion. <br />Mayor Klausing noted the difference in the City Council versus individual Coun- <br />cilmembers making demands of staff; and further noted that the Council majority <br />had supported this different budget approach. Mayor Klausing noted that it was <br />not fair to staff, at the near end of the process, for one Councilmember to decide <br />to use a different process; and questioned why the City Council could not com- <br />plete this budget process based on the information provided to-date by staff, using <br />general budget categories broken down by department. Mayor Klausing recog- <br />nized that, in past years, there was an even greater breakdown, but opined that the <br />previous process was much more confusing and opaque, with this process provid- <br />ing abetter understanding for the City Council and public of specific programs <br />and funding. Mayor Klausing advised that he could not agree that the City <br />Council could not make budget decisions and determinations based on the infor- <br />mation provided to-date. <br />Councilmember Ihlan used Recreation Administration as an example in past years <br />versus this year's lump number, when salaries and benefits were broken down <br />from 2005 - 2007, with 2008 actual budget and 2009 proposed budget lines. <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that this provided sufficient detail rather than a <br />summary to determine where the money was going, a crucial need for her if she <br />was to seek meaningful ways to reduce the budget. Councilmember Ihlan reiter- <br />ated that she'd had that information every year she'd served on the City Council; <br />and was asking for the same information to be provided this year, even if a differ- <br />ent budget process was in play, for it to correspond to the summary numbers. <br />Councilmember Ihlan advised that this is public data, and even if not in the exact <br />format, she was seeking the information as a Councilmember and on behalf of the <br />public who needed this information. <br />Councilmember Johnson questioned Mr. Miller's next step if the City Council <br />provided direction to staff at tonight's meeting; and whether that would not in fact <br />be to create a line item document. <br />Mr. Miller concurred, that at some point, staff would do so, but not within the <br />timeframe of a few days, and that it would take him 2-3 days to recreate the line <br />item if he were to work 24/7; but cautioned that it would not tie back to the BFO <br />process. Mr. Miller used Councilmember Ihlan's example of Parks Administra- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.