Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 23, 2009 <br />Page 13 <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned if the City Council had actually taken a vote that <br />they decided to levy back the actual amount of state aid lost; and opined that levy- <br />ing was not the only alternative, and the budget could be cut by that amount rely- <br />ing on reserves or other sources of revenue. <br />Mayor Klausing advised that no actual vote had been taken, but when the ranking <br />discussions were held, the City Council had indicated a high priority in levying, <br />represented by it then being included in the proposed budget; and questioned if a <br />formal motion would be required. <br />Councilmember Ihlan referenced a recent Pioneer Press newspaper article that <br />she shared verbally, quoting a representative of the League of Minnesota Cities <br />(LMC) related to proposed municipal property taxes and averages of various cit- <br />ies. Councilmember Ihlan opined that the City of Roseville was out of step with <br />the rest of the State of MN; and questioned how the City Council could make <br />suggestions (i.e., outdoor skating rinks) without having line items, rather than <br />ranking sheets, available for reference. Councilmember Ihlan opined that the <br />other option of directing the City Manager to cut the levy by percentage points <br />across the board could be very damaging with the limited information available to <br />Councilmembers at this time. Councilmember Ihlan recognized that Council- <br />members had received an updated reserve report from staff and suggested further <br />consideration of using some of those reserves judiciously. Councilmember Ihlan <br />questioned, with the limited information available, why the public should bother <br />to attend the Truth in Taxation hearing if the City Council set the budget tonight; <br />and opined that this would not represent a public process. <br />Mayor Klausing opined that rationale for attempting to set the budget at this meet- <br />ing was 180 degrees different than how Councilmember Ihlan was attempting to <br />paint it; with this BFO process initiated based on past concerns and as a direct re- <br />sponse, and a good one, to involve the public more by having something concrete <br />for them to respond to, with hard numbers on the City Council proposed budget. <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that the City was not providing the public with suf- <br />ficient background information. <br />Mayor Klausing opined that he and Councilmember Ihlan disagreed on that point. <br />Councilmember Ihlan sought further discussion and individual thoughts on use of <br />reserves in the 2010 budget, those under or over target percentages based on pol- <br />icy, and proposed 2010 budget additions for capital replacement funds and how <br />they were identified in the budget expenditure summaries. <br />Mr. Miller advised that the proposed budget did not increase capital expenditure <br />funds at all. <br />