My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_1123
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_1123
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2009 9:08:45 AM
Creation date
12/11/2009 9:08:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/23/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 23, 2009 <br />Page 22 <br />Mr. Miller advised that the staff memorandum dated November 9, 2009 included <br />alternative revenue sources, with the two most significant being the street light ut- <br />ility fee, estimated to generate $300,000 annually and covering all lighting costs <br />and their replacements; and the gas and electric franchise fee, estimated to gener- <br />ate $600,000 annually, based on a 1 % fee; with both available for the City Coun- <br />cil to implement in 2010 if they so directed. Mr. Miller advised that it would take <br />time to create the process, but that they could be accomplished. <br />Councilmembers concurred that they were interested in pursuing both discussions <br />on both options; and directed staff provide additional information on the process <br />for implementation, with the exception of the proposed student fee. <br />Councilmember Roe spoke in support of the street light fee as a direct correlation <br />to the availability of street lights in the City; however, he cautioned the need to <br />base that fee on that specific reduction in the proposed tax levy, not just a portion <br />thereof; and allowing clarity for residents of the implementation and related re- <br />duction accordingly. <br />Mayor Klausing suggested that staff take those suggestions provided by Council- <br />members during tonight's discussion and refine the budget and levy accordingly. <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned the additional internal loan and levy impact on <br />the budget expenditure summary under debt service funds. <br />Mr. Miller advised that in 2001, the City refunded outstanding debt to take advan- <br />tage of lower rates, requiring the use of reserves from other funds to accomplish <br />that; with the amount being levied back annually to replenish that fund, which <br />would be accomplished in 2011. <br />Public Comment <br />Gary Grefenberg, 91 Mid Oaks Lane <br />Mr. Grefenberg provided a bench handout for the record entitled, "Several Unan- <br />swered Budget Questions and a Few New Ones for Roseville City Officials," <br />dated November 22, 2009. Mr. Grefenberg thanked Mr. Miller for his assistance <br />in addressing overtime; and asked that City staff be asked to assist the budget <br />process by agreeing to a freeze on their step increases in 2010. Mr. Grefenberg <br />opined that he was not seeking a zero percent levy increase; but asked that the <br />City Council review his additional questions, and that staff continue to cooperate <br />and respond to the public. <br />Bob Willmus <br />Mr. Willmus referenced Councilmember Pust's comments about ice rinks and re- <br />lated personnel and positions; and questioned if a portion of the funding was re- <br />moved, what other services could be impacted. Mr. Willmus opined that it was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.