My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_1123
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_1123
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2009 9:08:45 AM
Creation date
12/11/2009 9:08:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/23/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 23, 2009 <br />Page 23 <br />difficult to tell from the BFO process. Mr. Willmus, related to the 10-year CIP, <br />questioned if the City Council had undertaken a priority process on that, and if <br />not, why; and questioned whether any labor costs were built into the CIP and <br />should be extrapolated. Mr. Willmus further asked, as the City Council continues <br />the process, if it was possible for the City Council to carry forward the 2009 <br />budget into 2010 and amend it at later point when agreement was reached, still <br />carrying forward the maximum preliminary levy amount of 9%, but subsequently <br />reducing it based on further discussion down the road. <br />At the directive of Mayor Klausing, Mr. Miller responded that, under state law, <br />the City Council was required to adopt an annual budget, but subsequent to that <br />requirement, the City Council retained the discretion to amend the budget at any <br />time. Mr. Miller advised that the City Council could adopt the 2009 budget by <br />resolution at their December 21, 2009 meeting as well as a final tax levy; but <br />clarified that the levy could not change after January 2, 2010. <br />Mayor Klausing questioned what this would accomplish other than postponing the <br />decision-making process. <br />Councilmember Ihlan, referencing the CIP, clarified her understanding of the City <br />Council's acceptance and approval of the ten year plan, was that any capital deci- <br />sions had to have specific City Council action at the time they were expended; <br />with the plan serving as an outline of projected needs, but that the City Council <br />didn't sign off on ten years' worth of capital improvements. Councilmember Ih- <br />lan opined that, even though those capital items had not yet been prioritized, they <br />should be done on an annual basis. <br />Councilmember Roe opined that a hiring freeze or step increase freeze would not <br />zero out the levy increase. Councilmember Roe deferred to staff's analysis of <br />where additional adjustments could be made. <br />Councilmember Pust opined that a freeze of step increases should be on the list. <br />Councilmember Ihlan sought a census of her suggestion to look at reserves. <br />Mayor Klausing opined that he was opposed to spending reserves. <br />Councilmember Ihlan requested a list of capital expenditures included in the pro- <br />posed 2010 budget for City Council consideration to determine if they should be <br />funded from reserves. <br />Councilmember Roe supported Councilmember Ihlan's request. <br />11. Public Hearings <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.