My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_1123
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_1123
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2009 9:08:45 AM
Creation date
12/11/2009 9:08:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/23/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 23, 2009 <br />Page 3 <br />Klausing moved, Johnson seconded, scheduling a public hearing for Monday, De- <br />cember 7, 2009 to consider renewal of liquor licenses for the calendar year 2010; <br />as detailed in the Request for Council Action dated November 23, 2009. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Roe; Pust; Johnson; Ihlan; and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />8. Consider Items Removed from Consent <br />a. Receive Update of City Grant Applications (former Consent Item d) <br />At the request of Mayor Klausing, Mr. Miller briefly reviewed this item. <br />Councilmember Ihlan noted the MN DEED grant in the amount of $1,000,000 re- <br />quiring matching, for property acquisition and construction of a segment of the <br />Twin Lakes Parkway and reconstruction of Prior Avenue. Councilmember Ihlan <br />opined that, when the City is working on the 2010 Budget and proposing a Pre- <br />liminary Levy of nine percent (9%), spending public funds on a parkway segment <br />not needed for immediate development purposes was uncalled for and needed se- <br />rious consideration in the future during a time of tight economies. Councilmem- <br />ber Ihlan further opined that the public needed to be aware of such uses of public <br />money. <br />Mayor Klausing sought clarification, and Mr. Miller confirmed, that this was tax <br />increment financing (TIF) money. <br />Councilmember Roe sought clarification, and Mr. Miller confirmed, that this was <br />TIF District No. 11, and that the money was restricted by state law and offered no <br />unilateral discretion for use; and that if the District were to be decertified, any <br />available excess funds above and beyond those expended would be returned to <br />various agencies (i.e., School District, Ramsey County, and the City). <br />Councilmember Roe asked how long it would take and impacts to the 2010 <br />budget, if the City decided to help the budget by not spending TIF money at this <br />time and decertifying the District. <br />Mr. Miller advised that decertification is not a quick process, and there would be <br />no relief to the 2010 budget, and possibly some to the 2011 budget depending on <br />timing; and that the City would receive approximately $250,000 of the $1 million. <br />Mr. Miller cautioned that the City would need to ensure that there were no other <br />obligations for which the City may be responsible (i.e., existing payment to a pre- <br />vious land owner), and that such a decision should not be made lightly. <br />Councilmember Roe clarified that if the process was initiated for decertification, <br />if done in 2010, it could possibly impact the 2011 tax receipts. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.