My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0112_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0112_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:06:31 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:39:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
1/12/2004
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
210
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION/DIRECTION <br />L�}�TE:�]: l�r� <br />ITEM NO: 6. B. <br />Department Approval: Agenda Section: <br />DPW/TP Discussion <br />Item Description: Amendment to text of Non Conforming Uses within City Code Section <br />1011 and 1002 (PF353'n <br />1.0 BACKGROUND: <br />� i Non-conforming uses within zoning Section 1011 of the code need to be modernized. The staff is <br />recommending two updates that would reduce time, variance paper work. and clarify the policy of <br />— the city. These amendments are to Section 1011.02 wherein staff proposes the following <br />ex tc�''�]�c•cxi�ti�ti� r�onc�nf in� ssruc�u;�s ar.d��r ��c.�": <br />� <br />� �� � :� �� "'. �� � ' � �-- �._�— �,�_��. ��~- -k�� <br />��. }4n tx�ans�rm �f s p�c�xistmg rrs��cnti�] p�nc�plt ca� �c.c.cssoR}� sh-u�.i� �a an F�-] u� <br />R-2 zoning district, while maintaining the same property line setbacks and <br />structure separations, and without further encroachmenton any non-conformingstructur <br />dimension or increase in the non-conformity of use of the 1and, unless to a conforming <br />use, sha11 be permitted. (Ord. 881, 6-1-81) <br />.i� <br />.� <br />e „[-, <br />_ � <br />'� <br />t <br />i <br />• �, A lawful pre-existing noa�� f ng structure or use may be changed to lessen the non- <br />� conformity. Once a non�ng�tructure or use of land has been changed to a lesser non- <br />conformity, it cannot thereafter be altered to increase the nonconformity (or change back <br />��' to what was there previously). <br />u_ A pre-existing principle or accessory structure, and expansion thereof, in which a property <br />line setback dimension has been made dimensionallysubstandard by eminent domain or <br />other formal public agency action sha11 be considered a le�allv conforming structure. This <br />� clari�ies what happened when the County, MnDOT, or the city expands a road right-of- <br />r <br />r way. It is not the fault of the property owner, who could then ask for a setback variance for <br />! mortgage/iinancial due diligence purposes. <br />� <br />i <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� �. For the following de�inition in Section1002, (NONCONFORMING USE OR �� <br />STRUCTURE) the de�inition has been expanded to include both "use" and "structure" as � <br />follows: a nonconforming use or structure is any use, placement, or arrangement of land ' <br />and/or structures 1ega11y existing prior to the enactment of a Code provision prohibiting � <br />�,- � such use or structure. ,�+r _ <br />� . . � . -, k ,�. - � - �—�, � <br />�.� �Cf�GESTi i.Il AC�r�f: . �. — � �� ---" � � - � r <br />Discussion and direction as needed. <br />Report Prepared by: Dennis Welsch, Com.Development Director (651-792-7071) <br />Attachment: Proposed Ordinance <br />\\Victoria\ConunDev�Planning_Zoning�Planning Files�3500-3549�3537 Non-Conforming Use - Section 1002 & <br />1O11�RCDD-Pf3537 Nonconfornling Amendment(011204).doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.