My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0308_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0308_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 2:16:34 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:40:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
185
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting — 02/23/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 14 <br />whether the Council wished to have the City Attorney's office <br />pursue the issue; and 2) if affirmative, what shape, enforcement, <br />and related information needed to be determined at a later date <br />when a draft ordinance was before the City Council for <br />consideration, at which time public comment could be received. <br />Ihlan moved, Maschka seconded, directing the City Attorney to <br />do preliminary research on the feasibility of the City of Roseville <br />enacting an ordinance to have local candidates publicly disclose <br />any campaign contributions in excess of $100.00. <br />Councilmember Schroeder reiterated his opposition to directing <br />the City Attorney to spend time and taxpayer money on this <br />issue; questioning whether something was wrong or illegal with <br />current contribution disclosure according to state statute. <br />Mayor Klausing noted that there would be no additional billing <br />time from the City Attorney's office, as it was part of their <br />retainer. <br />City Attorney Anderson concurred with Mayor Klausing's <br />statement. <br />Mayor Klausing spoke in support of further pursuit to determine <br />if there was something that could be improved upon in the local <br />election campaigning; opining he was confident that there was <br />no corruption; but favored making the process more transparent. <br />John Kysylyczyn, 3083 Victoria Street N <br />Mr. Kysylyczyn disagreed with assertions that the City <br />Attorney's time was free, opining that administrative staff would <br />be involved and their time was not free. Mr. Kysylyczyn further <br />opined that this idea was poorly thought-out and researched by <br />Councilmember Ihlan. Mr. Kysylyczyn noted that during his <br />tenure as Mayor, he had brought forward a clean election <br />proposal with spending limits; and that the Roseville Concerned <br />Citizens had also brought forward several proposals in the past, <br />and identified the lack of support from Mayor Klausing and <br />Councilmember Maschka at that time. <br />Mr. Kysylyczyn concluded by opining that the public was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.