Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />pipeline company clear cut the pine trees it� his backyard. The pipeline company will not <br />allow trees. <br />Lorraine Macheck, (neighbor directly acro�s Oakcrest at 1323 Oakcrest Avenue) <br />expressed concern with lighting. How wilt headlights be handled from the new <br />driveway; she was concerned about the ali�nment of setbacks. <br />� Todd Guerrero said the development intere'�t is private, not public. He asked that the <br />9 Planning Commission identify the public i nteres�_ The Council members should not <br />I O rubberstamp the project. Traffic does not �8,r�r a�rpro�ra� of the project. <br />E1 <br />C� Sandy McGiffin, 1379 Brooks, asked for d�tails of the drainage plan. Debra Bloom <br />E 3 explained drainage policy. She asked, bas d on the drainage plan, what will happen to <br />�� the storm water under the power lines? Ho many vehicles will there be during peak <br />!� hours ;( less than 8 per hour) adding more t affic creates problems. <br />f� <br />I� <br />i8 <br />I� <br />�� <br />�I <br />�� <br />� <br />� <br />�3 <br />�6 <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�1 <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�$ <br />��� <br />�� <br />�l <br />�2 <br />�3 <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />Chair Mulder closed the hearing. <br />Member Ipsen asked for details in the �ompreh�nsi�r� Plan. Thomas Paschke explained <br />the goals and policies. Thomas �a���c� ��pRa�n�d �+� ������}�. <br />Chair Mulder asked for conditions or amendments. <br />Member Peper explained the gaps in the pr�l�osal (porches, decks, screening, <br />landscaping, and storm water) should be c��sYpleted and worked out with the neighbors. <br />Member Bakeman noted the landscaping ca�n also be done on adj oining property to solve <br />the screening. Mr. Stull said he would hav� another meeting regarding landscaping and <br />screening. <br />Member Bakeman asked for details on pati�s and decks. They should not be between the <br />units. How large should a patio or deck h�� Chair Mulder said the integral porch is the <br />only porch that should be accepted. <br />Thomas Paschke explained the porch is best as proposed. <br />may allow for pathway and small deck �re�s . A 10' or evE <br />usable. Pro�mity to the boundary line i� rnost important. <br />enclosed. <br />The deck/patio between units <br />n 12' deck is the minimum <br />Decks and patios cannot be <br />Member Blank said new design should be b�etter than this, higher quality, and better <br />aesthetics. Big, long roofs are disapp��nlang. Break up roof lines from back side of units, <br />especially on Hamline ,�k��nue, �c�n�ici�r wa}�� to add e�erior designs. <br />Member Peper asked for details regarding tl�e fire safety vehicles. Thomas Paschke <br />explained it has been reviewed positively by the Fire Marshal. Access is from both <br />streets and the shallow length of the private street, allows front in drives, with a back out <br />