Laserfiche WebLink
I in emergencies. <br />� <br />� Chair Mulder suggested the developer meet and work with the property owners to the <br />� north on Oakcrest. <br />5 <br />� Motion: Member Beckman moved, seconded by Member Stone, to recommend approval <br />� of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment fro� LR, Low Density Residential to MR, <br />� Medium Density Residential(town homes)� as consistent with the Roseville <br />9 Comprehensive Plan policies, as discussed in Section 5 of the proj ect report dated March <br />9 � 3,2004. <br />�E <br />1� <br />]3 <br />]� <br />9� <br />i�r <br />]� <br />�� <br />]� <br />�� <br />�] <br />�� <br />�� <br />Ayes: Bakeman, Peper, Stone, Ipsen, Blank, Mulder <br />Nays: None <br />Motion carried 6-0. <br />Motion: Member Bakeman moved, seconded by Member Peper, to recommend approval <br />of the Preliminary Plat, creating 8 town ho�e lots and a common lot, subj ect to the <br />conditions listed in Section 7 of this report. <br />Ayes: Bakeman, Peper, Stone, Ipsen, Blanlq, Mulder <br />Nays: None <br />Motion carried 6-0. <br />� Motion: Member Stone moved, seconded �y Member Bakeman, to recommend approval <br />�� of the Rezoning from R-1, Single Family R'�sidence Districtto Planned Unit <br />�� Developmentwith an underlying zoning ofR-6, Townhouse District. <br />�? <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />Ayes: Bakeman, Peper, Stone, Ipsen, Blanl�', Mulder <br />Nays: None <br />Motion carried 6-0. <br />�I <br />� f Motion: Member Stone moved, seconded l�y Member Bakeman, to recommend approval <br />�� of the General Concept Development Plann�d Unit Development Plan, subj ect to the <br />�� conditions listed in Section 7 of the project �eport dated March 3,2004, as amended by <br />3 � the Planning Commission: <br />�� <br />3'� <br />�$ <br />�� <br />�{� <br />�# I <br />�� <br />�3 <br />� <br />�5 <br />� <br />A. Sidewalk must be included i� the Final Development Plan stage, which <br />location depends on the supp�orted private road access. <br />B. The design of the town hom s must be compatible with the general <br />conte� and human scale of t�ie neighborhood for both architecture design <br />and building materials, inclu�iing a hip roof to lower overall height (if <br />possible) and other architectutral elements to further enhance each <br />structure and reduce the visu�l mass of the building, especially on the back <br />side elevations.. <br />