2004_0329_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Hamline as low density residential. I am not the only neighborwho made a decision to buy, remodel or stay in an existing home based upon this Plan. Please considerour plight. To follow the Comprehensive Plan and to keep in the characterof the rest of the neighborhood, this property should remain low density residential. Statistics in the staff report conceming lot coverage are cause for alarm. Impervious coverage is estimated at 41 % of the lot and 28% would be floor area of the units themselves. The footprint of the buildings on the Oakcrest side would be appreciable closer to Oakcrest than the neighboring properties to the east. This is predominately a single-family neighborhood that has reached the saturation point with present and planned development and traffic. Adding eight units may not seem like a lot to you, but this is an area of single-family homes that has already has had its share of development. Near Oakcrest and north to County Road C, the west side of Hamline has Rosepointe, office condos and an office building. It is importantto consider high-density developments already planned for the Hamline Center and Arona sites that will also negatively impact our neighborhood, even though they are located in Planning District 3, just north of District 8, where the subject parcel is located. Traffic statistics used by City staff and relied upon by the Planning Commission are from 2000 and outdated. Traffic on Hamline and on Oakcrest has definitely increased in the past four years. Ask any of the residents in the area about their difficulties tuming from side streets or driveways onto Hamline. During peak traffic times access is challenging, to say the least. Many mornings, traffic stacks to the north past Brooks trying to get through the light at County Road B-2. Many evenings, traffic stacks from the light on County Road C to the south past Brooks Ave. At the very least, the project should be tabled until a traffic study is performed that would evaluate present traffic on Hamline and Oakcrest as well as take into effect the impact on Hamline from the planned developments on the Arona and Hamline Center sites. Planning Commission member statements that Roseville has made a commitment to the Metropolitan Council to increase density with the inference that this project is necessary to achieve that goal without regard to the desires of and daily impact on the people who live in the neighborhood— were particularly disturbing. The staff report to the Planning Commission states that 5-6 single-family homes could be built on the property. Only one could be built without subdivision. To say that 5-6 could be built, given the size of the lot (approximately 1.44 acres), is misleading. On this lot, almost 20% of the area is covered by pipeline and electrical utility easements. If this project is to go forward, please consider how the homes directly across from the project on Oakcrest can be screened from invasive headlights of cars �entering/exiting the project. Also, consider how my home, located to the