Laserfiche WebLink
Minnesota Department of Public Safety Briefing Sheet — November 2003 <br />Allied Radio Matrix for Emergency <br />ARMER <br />ith the passage of the 2002 Anti-terrorism <br />Bill, the Legislature directed the Minnesota <br />departments of Public Safety, Transportation, <br />Natural Resources, Administration, and other parties to <br />cooperatively develop a plan to design and implement <br />an 800 MHz digital radio system throughout Minnesota. <br />Need for the ARMER System <br />Even in the age of digital networks and cell phones, <br />communication interoperability — the ability of public <br />safety personnel to communicate by radio with respon- <br />ders from other agencies, on demand and in real time — <br />continues to be an elusive goal. <br />When public safety personnel cannot communicate <br />with each other, coordination is impeded and rescue <br />efforts are stalled in situations when every second counts. <br />Large-scale incidents in Minnesota, such as riots on col- <br />lege campuses, natural disasters, and a recent school shoot- <br />ing, highlight the need for communication interoperability. <br />ARMER System Capabilities <br />Minnesota's Allied Radio Matrix for Emergency <br />Response (ARMER) uses the latest and most advanced <br />technology to provide interactive communication capa- <br />bilities that are not available with older radio systems. <br />ARMER is designed to provide statewide radio cov- <br />erage to state, county, city public safety officers, and <br />government workers. <br />The system will provide radio coverage to mobile <br />radio users in 95 percent of the state, and on-the-street <br />portable radio users in 85 to 90 percent of the state. <br />ARMER will provide interoperability between users of <br />the system and between users and non-users. <br />The ARMER System Will: <br />Enhance public safety in Minnesota <br />Improve safety of emergency responders <br />Ensure standardization and interoperability <br />Develop and enhance partnerships <br />Encourage shared use of resources <br />Provide cost-sharing opportunities, leading to <br />savings <br />Response (ARMER) <br />�_� Phase 6 <br />� ��— <br />��,,. ,�� , <br />�5 , kT� <br />r.� r � •- • . rri�::-r. <br />�:_ �' s':-' - <br />. ; ""- .... {_ <br />� �y: ' .•i. ::- • <br />� _ -� � �- �•� s• <br />�i: .•i:__.:f"�._7}?' ." <br />....�, <br />.;. <br />_.. �_• - Y 1 <br />.I �� : <br />i .. � <br />1 <br />Phase 5 <br />2006 <br />I <br />i <br />� _� <br />��F7=� 4 <br />��5 <br />u <br />FI1ue � aonapla4� <br />P���e � �nld� <br />- � - —�-- � <br />Rh�:� a <br />�� <br />� <br />ARMER Implementation Phases <br />Phase 1(Complete) — Regional coverage in the seven- <br />county Metro area <br />Phase 2— Ongoing local coverage in the seven-cdunty <br />Metro area ` <br />Phase 3— Coverage in 23 counties in the Roches�er <br />and St. Cloud regions in 2004 � <br />Phase 4— Coverage in 12.5 counties in the Duluth and <br />Brainerd regions in 2005 <br />Phase 5— Coverage in 31 counties in the Mankato, <br />Marshall and Detroit Lakes regions in 2006 <br />Phase 6— Coverage in 11.5 counties in the Virginia <br />and Thief River Falls regions in 2007 <br />