Laserfiche WebLink
Minnesota Department of Public Safety Briefing Sheet — November 2003 <br />��� Allied Radio Matrix for Emergency <br />� � <br />� � � � � Res onse ARMER <br />p � ��������� <br />Funding <br />In June 2003, the Legislature approved the statewide <br />plan and appropriated $27 million for Phase 3. Another <br />$17 million is required to complete Phase 3. The <br />Department of Public Safety Division of Homeland <br />Security Emergency Management provided an additional <br />$6 million in federal funding for communities in Greater <br />Minnesota to acquire interoperable equipment to operate <br />on the shared radio system. <br />Statewide System History <br />1998 and 1999 — Minnesota Department of <br />Transportation Office of Electronic Communications <br />begins to share information about communication inter- <br />operability with sheriffs, chiefs of police, city and coun- <br />ty officials, and members of League of Cities and <br />Association of Counties <br />July 2000 — Legislature directs department of <br />Transportation, Public Safety, and Administrationto sub- <br />mit report on scope of problem for review in 2001 session. <br />September 2000 — Communications survey is mailed <br />to 700 local units of government with oversight of 1,500 <br />affected agencies. <br />October through December 2000 — Department of <br />Public Safety, Department ofAdministration and <br />Department of Transportation meet with representatives <br />ftom local governments to discuss the survey results. <br />February 2001— Final report is distributed to mem- <br />bers of the Legislature. No formal action is talcen. <br />July through December 2001— Department of <br />Transportationrequests $37 million to implement <br />interoperable radio communication system in the <br />Rochester and St. Cloud State Patrol districts. <br />June 2002 — Legislation calls for committee to develop <br />plan for statewide shared radio system. <br />Por more information, contact Assistant Public Safety <br />Commissioner T'nn Leslie at 651-296-6642. <br />Minnesota Stories: <br />The Difference Communication Can Make <br />Rocori High School <br />On September 24, a student at Rocori High School in <br />Cold Spring allegedly gunned down two schoolmates <br />with a handgun he brought to school in a bag. When <br />Cold Spring Police Chief Phil Jones arrived at the scene <br />minutes later, the 15-year-old freshman had already <br />turned in his weapon and no longer presented a t h a t. <br />If the situation had not been quickly resolved, the <br />responding agencies-which also included the �s�arns <br />County Sheriffs Office and the Minnesota State Patrol- <br />would lilcely ha�e opted to communicate through a <br />local, shared emergency channel. <br />An incident of greater magnitude, however, would <br />have brought additional responding agencies, which <br />would not have had access to this channel. <br />Hennepin County Government Center <br />On September 29, a woman brought a gun into the <br />Hennepin County Government Center and fatally shot <br />her cousin. She also shot and wounded her cousin's <br />attorney. The Minneapolis Police and Fire departments <br />and the Hennepin County Sheriffs Office responded <br />and were able to coordinate efforts, communicatingon <br />a shared, ARMER-prototype channel. <br />Minnesota State University, Mankato <br />When riots brolce out near Minnesota State University, <br />Manlcato, on the evening of October 4, public safety' <br />agencies from all over the region responded. Incident <br />command was severely handicapped, however, by tfrc <br />lacic of a common communications platform. Response <br />team deployment had to be based on available commu- <br />nication linl�.s rather than capabilities. This incident <br />demonstrateshow communications systems can create <br />a problem rather than serving as a tool to help resolve <br />a situation. <br />