Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />, City �' Roseville, Minnesota <br />� <br />J <br />� <br />Introduction <br />The purpose of this study is to develop an educational guide which can be used to <br />assist the City aF Roseville with the redevelopment of Twin Lakes and other <br />development in the City. This study will provide an overview aF specific <br />development and redevelopment tools, concepts, and financing issues, which in <br />all likelihood will be applicable to projects proposed in the near future. <br />� The Springsted study team began the process with a meeting of all appropnate <br />City Staff, and the City's development consultants and bond attorney. The <br />discussion centered on the redevelopment issues in the City, and specifically on <br />� the tools and concepts that are most likely to be utilized. This report contains an <br />instructional summary of these primary development/redevelopment tools and <br />financing concepts. <br />� <br />� <br />A. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND <br />REDEVELOPMENT TOOLS <br />This section focuses on specific tools and programs that entities are statutorily <br />authorized to use to facilitate redevelopment. <br />1. Ta�c Increment Financing <br />(Minnesota Statutes Chapter 469.174 — 469.1791) <br />Tax Increment Financing (TIF) uses the increased property taxes generated by <br />'� new real estate development within a defined geographic area to pay for certain <br />�� eligible costs associated with the new development. The value that is "captured" <br />(i.e. the increase in value over the year the TI F district was established) generates <br />� property taxes. These incremental property taxes are collected by the Authority <br />creating the district (City, EDA, HRA, etc.) and then appropriated to the project. <br />The incremental taxes are used to assist eligible project costs such as land <br />acquisition, demolition, public and site improvements, and related consulting and <br />� administrative costs. The value aF the property prior to development (i.e., the <br />"non-captured" portion or "base value") continues to generate property taxes and <br />is distributed to all appropriatetaxing jurisdictions. <br />'� The justification for the use of TI F rests solely with the "But For" test. I n order for <br />the City to create a TIF district it must make a finding that the new development <br />� would not occur "but for" the use of tax increment financing. Counties and school <br />districts may challenge this finding, because creating a TIF districtwill not result in <br />any enhancement to their general tax base until after the TIF district is terminated. <br />The term of a TIF district varies depending upon the type of district created. <br />� Project costs can be financed with general obligation tax increment bonds, straight <br />revenue bonds, or pay-as-you-go notes. Financing options are discussed in a <br />.� later section of this report. Tax increment revenues may be spent outside of the <br />: � TIF district or "pooled" with other districts, but these pooled expenditures carry <br />with them some fairly significant restrictions. <br />� <br />" k. <br />k� <br />SPRiNGSTED F�� 3 <br />