My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0524_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0524_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 12:11:58 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:41:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
228
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�,'� No new street or utility construction is necessary to serve the proposed division. Sewer <br />and water laterals and utility easements are necessary for the vacant developable parcel <br />and a new driveway access on to Asbury Avenue will need to be approved by the <br />Roseville Public Worlcs Department. <br />�_� Should the request be approved by the City Council, the staff, prior to the applicant's <br />recording with the Ramsey County Recorder, must review a certificate of survey and a <br />quit claim deed for compliance with the Council's approval. <br />.�.* STAFF FINDINGS & CONDITIONS: <br />� 1 In review of the Roseville City Code, the City Planner has concluded that the adiustment <br />in t�ropertv line from its existin� location to the �ro�osed location falls under a <br />"RECOMBINATION" under Section 1104.04B and not a"THREE PARCEL MINOR <br />SUBDIVISION" as noticed to the �ublic. <br />3,� In February of 2004 Mr. Albertson applied for a VARIANCE and MINOR <br />SUBDIVISION, seeking approval to create a substandardparcel width. On April 7,2004 <br />the Planning Commission held the public hearing requiring the request and unanimously <br />recommended denial, which action lead to the subsequent withdrawal of the request by <br />Mr. Albertson. During the Planning Commission's hearing, staff indicated to the <br />residents that should Mr. Albertson desire to divide the parcel in a manner that meets the <br />City Code, the process would be forwarded to the Council and the neighborhood would <br />be notified of the legal lot line adjustment. <br />�_� The City Planner has concluded that the proposal meets the requirements of the <br />Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. <br />3_� The City Planner has concluded that the request meets the requirements of Section <br />1004.016 (Residential Dimensional Requirements), Section 1103.06A1 and Section <br />11.0406F of the Roseville City Code. Specifically, both parcels have a minimum width <br />of 85 feet, a depth of 110 feet and a minimum of 11,000 sq. ft. Parcel "B" although <br />uniquely designed) has a minimum width of 85 feet at the established 30 foot front yard <br />setbacic. Parcel "B" has lot lines at substantial right angles to the street line. <br />�,� The City policy is to accept parlc land or cash in lieu of land dedication for the creation of <br />new lots. However. Mr. Albertson is not creatin� a new lot, but rather adjusting the <br />existing line. No parlc land dedication is required for this change in lot design. <br />3. f� The City policy is to accept a Sewer AvailabilityCharge (SAC) upon the issuance of a <br />building permit. In this case, a SAC fee is required and will be collected upon the <br />issuance of a building permit for Parcel B. <br />PF3556_RCA_051004 Page 2 of3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.