My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0621_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0621_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 2:54:54 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:42:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STAFF MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL <br />with them: <br />County Rebuild B-2: We have discussed this with the Council and properiy owners <br />previously. While the County agrees that County Road B-2 has issues with drainage <br />and is showing deterioration, the County does not plan to reconstruct the residential <br />portion of B-2 any time in the foreseeable future. They do expect to perform a <br />maintenanceproject at some indefinite time in the future; this would include a mill and <br />overlay. The County has indicated that their cost for a maintenanceproject for this <br />portion of B-2 would be in the $300-$500,000 range. <br />City Rebuild B-2 to County Standards: We discussed this option with the County. <br />They would support the City managing a reconstructionproject along this portion of <br />the road. However, they would require the street to be at least 38 feet wide. Their cost <br />participation in this proj ect again would be limited to their cost to perform a <br />maintenanceproject as described above. <br />Countv Turnback of B-2 to Citv; Citv Rebuild B-2 to Citv Standards: The County <br />would consider a turnback of the portion of County Road B-2 from Lexington to Rice <br />Street. With a turnback, the City could reconstruct the road to City street standards, 32- <br />to 34-feet wide with concrete curb and gutter and drainage improvements. The County <br />would negotiate with the City to establish a level of County cost participation. <br />Participationwould be more than a maintenance project but not the 50150 cost share <br />level that we discussedwith them at the meeting. <br />In all of these scenarios, the County is not able to commit definitively and categoricallyto a level <br />of funding at this time; their road funds are allocatedto projects for the next 3 years. There is a <br />potential to get additional turnback funds, but the County would have to work with their Board <br />on this alternate. <br />Financial Implications: The only option that we discussedwith the County that would meet the <br />expectations of the neighborhood is the turnback of the road between Lexington and Rice Street. <br />We have prepared an estimated cost and proposed financing for the turnback option. <br />Reconstructionof CountyRoad B-2 wl <br />Attached Pathwa <br />Federal Funding $730,000.00 <br />Assessments (street costs only) <br />17372.6 feet at $23.401 foot $410,616.66 <br />Coun Partici ation estimated $500,000 <br />City of Roseville Funding $1,965,936.66 <br />TotalPro'ect Cost* $3 602 455.50 <br />*includes engineeringcosts <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.