Laserfiche WebLink
•�� Pr�dfrn}nar� Assessmentof <br />Eliminating Twin Lakes Parkway <br />• Traffic Flow (continued): <br />– Some concepts for retail, assuming elimination of <br />Twin Lakes Parkway, may stil� need access directly <br />from the 1-35W ramp. This would require further <br />discussionwith Mn/DOT, <br />– The elimination of Twin Lakes Parkway would <br />additionallyburdentwo critical left tum movements: <br />southbound Clevelandto eastbound CR C, and <br />eastbound CR C W northbound Fairview. tt is not <br />clearwh�heradditional left turn lane volume could <br />be accommodatedin these areas <br />_..�, <br />� <br />�•�+:��•�OFI�$�� � <br />• ��+ •— <br />� � ��:� ^ — <br />I• "• --rr; .v�.� <br />r • ��.. <br />.. � <br />r • . <br />��,►�.*�a��pt 1 <br />. '� _ <br />� � . � ��� `�� <br />r �'��, • <br />r�' " <br />• ' � i <br />. � . ._ <br />�y��� , � • <br />� r .iti. • . <br />r . i�. <br />� Workshop # 10 - <br />Concept Plan <br />Refine Preferred AkemaWes into a Concept Plan forthe Sde <br />to indude: � <br />— RoacMvays. Open space,LandscapedAreas, <br />Pon�ng (generally). Land Uses. Olher FeaWres <br />� <br />I . Panelwill Pmvide Feedbackto DevebpmeritT�m <br />. Devebpment T�m C�tigE of Concept Plan <br />- Irrtroduce Issues to be Addressed through Deslgn Standards. <br />Mitigation Strategies <br />• Implam4r��an Too" CFrolCes <br />I � '� Post report on <br />' Meeting with Staff �� website arr� <br />i n NevuJette�' <br />��i� <br />