Laserfiche WebLink
City Manager's 2005 Budget Memo <br />Page 7 of 27 <br />them credit for, that government services are subject to the same <br />economy and the same inflationary pressures as other daily expenses <br />-- such as the cost of clothing, groceries, and movies. We operate in <br />the same economy and are not immune from the same inflationary <br />trends. <br />And paralleling inflation does not mean the Council cannot cut gov- <br />ernment spending. Certainly you can. It just requires that we all be <br />upfront about the government program or project you want to cut <br />rather than cutting everything indirectly by failing to keep up with <br />inflation. <br />Hence, I offer this recommendation for Council consideration: <br />Council Action Recommendation #2: Council motion approving <br />[disapproving] the general budgeting principle that city property <br />taxes should not exceed on a cumulative basis the rate of infla- <br />tion, but barring exceptional circumstances city property taxes <br />should parallel each year the rate of inflation so the city does not <br />fall behind in funding equipment and facility depreciation ac- <br />counts, does not fall behind in offering salaries that are neces- <br />sary to attract and retain great employees, and does not fall be- <br />hind in paying operating expenses subject to inflation that must <br />be paid if we are to provide even the same level of city services <br />from one year to the next. <br />III. Recommended Budget for the City Council, Administration, <br />and Finance. <br />A. City Council. <br />I recommend several changes in the budget for the City Council next <br />year. I don't think we are in a position any longer to be a member of <br />