My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0712_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0712_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 2:12:47 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:43:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Manager's 2005 Budget Memo <br />Page 8 of 27 <br />the I-35W Corridor Coalition. Last year, along with the other re- <br />maining members of the Coalition we cut back our membership con- <br />tribution 10%, or $3,500, based on total membership dues of $35,000 <br />each year. This year, I think Roseville needs to take the next step and <br />do what our neighbors in Shoreview and Arden Hills have already <br />done, and that is drop our Coalition membership. <br />The Coalition does not provide direct services to taxpayers. It doesn't <br />zone property, issue building permits, or conduct inspections. In- <br />stead, it is a group that emphasizes lobbying and studies. And while I <br />generally support targeted efforts to lobby and study, in 2002 we <br />dropped our membership in similar lobbying groups: the Associa- <br />tion for Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) and the Municipal Leg- <br />islative Commission (MLC). And the value of studies, in my opinion, <br />can be substantial but should be evaluated on a case-by-case, project- <br />by-project basis; I don't think we can afford any longer the luxury of <br />having the Coalition permanently on the city payroll in order to do <br />studies if and when the need arises. <br />Council Action Recommendation #3: Council motion eliminating <br />[continuing] the City's membership in the I-35W Corridor Coali- <br />tion. <br />Similarly, I recommend not continuing taxpayer support for the <br />Roseville Ambassador Foundation. The Foundation has operated <br />successfully for many years with support only from the private sec- <br />tor: primarily the Edina Realty branch office in Roseville and Ann <br />and Mike Hermes. They have done a great job. Clearly it is a passion <br />of theirs. <br />Sut private sector funding, not public funding, is how Ambassador <br />Foundations are funded elsewhere in the metro. I suggest that pri- <br />vate funding from locally successful businesses is an appropriate way <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.