Laserfiche WebLink
City Manager's 2005 Budget Memo <br />Page 9 of 27 <br />for those businesses to give back to the community that has given <br />them much in return. And such private sector funding actually helps <br />keep such foundations alive; public sector financing tends to remove <br />incentives and thereby diminishes vitality. <br />Finally, when we are cutting hundreds of thousands from our budget <br />— including, as you will see below in my recommendations, cutting <br />five city employee positions — it is extremely difficult to explain to <br />employees and our residents how we continue to find and prioritize <br />tax money for the Ambassador program but not for city employees <br />and city services that provide a greater benefit to a larger segment of <br />the community on a day-to-day basis. <br />Council Action Recommendation #4: Council motion eliminating <br />[continuing] the City's appropriation for the Roseville Ambassa- <br />dor Foundation. <br />B. Administration. <br />The major change I want to emphasize in Administration does not <br />deal directly with the Administration budget per se but instead af- <br />fects department budgets citywide and our ability to continue to <br />compete successfully for the best and the brightest city employees. <br />think we need to address the City's pay scale. <br />I recommend a two-fold approach. One, I recommend the Council <br />adopt a city pay scale that is slightly less than the Stanton V average <br />pay scale for cities our size. Two, to continue to attract and retain <br />high performing employees, I recommend a performance pay dimen- <br />sion to our pay scale that gives a limited number of city employees an <br />opportunity to earn up to 15% above the Stanton V average. Per- <br />formance pay would be based on a sustained pattern of superior per- <br />formance as measured by outcomes. <br />