Laserfiche WebLink
City Manager's 2005 Budget Memo <br />Page 25 of 27 <br />approved undergrounding tariff, putting above-ground facilities un- <br />derground is expensive. Sut a franchise fee could generate sufficient <br />revenue over time to finally accomplish this project citywide. Then, <br />like the outer-ring suburbs with whom Roseville competes for new <br />residents, and especially families with children, Roseville would be <br />largely free of overhead electric lines. <br />As part of this feasibility study, I recommend we consider using these <br />franchise fees not only to pay for the undergrounding work on public <br />easements and public rights-of-way, but also to underground the <br />"drop" or utility connection that is on a resident's private property. <br />Yes, those costs can be substantial too and we need to address that. <br />Council Action Recommendation #22: Council motion approving <br />[disapproving] a feasibility study to create a city franchise fee ef- <br />fective January 1, 2005, for electric and gas utility lines in public <br />rights-of-way with the proceeds to be deposited in 2005 to the <br />City's General Fund with a study undertaken in 2005 to consider <br />dedicating those funds to undergrounding above-ground electric <br />utility lines on public and private property. <br />VI. Recommended Budget for the Community Development De- <br />partment <br />This Department has largely "flown under the radar" from a budget <br />point of view the last two years because their operations are entirely <br />supported by building permit fees, not tax levy dollars. <br />Sut annual Department spending, mostly for salaries, has been ex- <br />ceeding annual permit fee revenues the last several years. We face <br />the prospect that, without a sudden and substantial and unexpected <br />increase in building permit fees, the Community Development re- <br />serve fund will be exhausted late in 2005. <br />