My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0712_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0712_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 2:12:47 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:43:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session — 06/21/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 14 <br />proposed moratorium for discussion purposes only, not as <br />an action item tonight. Mr. Welsch recommended that the <br />moratorium be put on the July 12, 2004 regular City <br />Council agenda for further discussion and possible <br />direction to staff for a First Reading. Mr. Welsch reviewed <br />the need for a moratorium to reduce incompatible use <br />developments possibly occurring in the area until the <br />planning process was completed in order to protect the <br />process and to a�oid detours. Mr. Welsch reviewed several <br />changes in business character within the development area <br />that had already occurred under interim uses; exterior or <br />interior renovation projects ready to begin; and changes in <br />uses from warehousing uses that are not permitted in <br />industrial districts. Mr. Welsch sought Council direction <br />for the proposed First Reading of such an ordinance at the <br />July 12, 2004 regular Council meeting. <br />Councilmember Maschka concurred with staff's <br />recommendation, opining that a moratorium was absolutely <br />necessary and important to reduce speculation in the <br />redevelopment area and reduce incompatible uses during <br />the planning process. <br />Councilmember Kough expressed concern regarding the <br />length of the proposed moratorium, the number of acres <br />involved; and potential hardships and affects on <br />landowners. <br />Mr. Welsch noted that land sales would not be prohibited, <br />just a limitation of uses; and that the moratorium would <br />apply to the fu11280 acres, excluding those that had already <br />been developed. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the proposed length of the <br />moratorium; the parameters available and preferable for the <br />Council to consider in line with State Statute so no one type <br />of use was singled out; purpose statement related to <br />applicable ongoing or future studies; and specific <br />exceptions for consideration. <br />Mayor Klausing opined his support of a moratorium; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.