My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0712_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0712_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 2:12:47 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:43:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session — 06/21/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 27 <br />problem and identified courses of action for mold abatement. <br />Mr. Schwartz summarized the report by noting that the floor and <br />roof drain systems had failed; better ventilation <br />recommendations; cleaning and sanitizing carpets; and <br />investigating for mold spores in the building; at an estimated <br />repair cost of $44,417.99. Mr. Schwartz reviewed the items that <br />would be incorporated in this cost. Mr. Schwartz concluded his <br />comments by seeking Council direction for the level of repair <br />they preferred; and whether to move forward in utilizing the <br />building for future use by the Parks and Recreation Department <br />as proposed for their storage needs. <br />Mayor Klausing opined his general support of abatement for the <br />Station, but noted that, as this is a Study Session, he preferred to <br />take action through the Consent Agenda at a future regular <br />meeting. Mayor Klausing sought consensus of the City Council <br />regarding whether additional information were needed. <br />Councilmember Schroeder sought additional information and <br />questioned whether this station was needed at all; pending <br />further study on the City's existing fire stations and possible <br />consolidation of operations. Councilmember Schroeder opined <br />that, prior to making a decision to repair the building, that issue <br />needed to be addressed. <br />Mayor Klausing noted that, with administrative functions <br />moving to the Public Safety building, whether the building were <br />used as a fire station or not, the Council may wish to consider <br />making it a�ailable for other issues, warranting its repair. <br />Councilmember Schroeder questioned the wisdom of spending a <br />substantial amount of money (i.e., $40,000 - 50,000) to repair a <br />building that was no longer needed; and reiterated his request for <br />additional information related to a fire station study to determine <br />if this building were needed. <br />City Manager Beets responded that a study, which included <br />options, background, ca11 analysis and other details, had been <br />presented to the City Council several years ago, with no resulting <br />Council action taken. Mr. Beets noted that additional follow up <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.