My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0712_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0712_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 2:12:47 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:43:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session — 06/21/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 26 <br />Councilmember Schroeder opined that the attempted motions <br />implied that staff would return for pathway construction; and he <br />couldn't support that until there was sufficient staff to maintain <br />pathways; and was not supportive of road reconstruction being <br />accomplished off-center to accommodate the pathway. <br />Councilmember Schroeder noted that, until he saw a clear <br />separation of the road and pathway, he would continue his <br />opposition, further opining that the proposed design is not the <br />right design, and not what the residents wanted, as well as not <br />meeting current budget constraints. <br />Mayor Klausing repeated Councilmember Maschka's motion on <br />whether to direct staff to move forward with pathway <br />construction from Lexington to Rice with federal funding. <br />Councilmember Maschka noted that he could not support <br />pathway construction without reconstruction of the road. <br />Further discussion ensued regarding options and direction to <br />staff. <br />Mayor Klausing concluded discussion by recommending that no <br />formal action be taken at tonight's meeting to move forward at <br />this time. <br />Councilmember Ihlan sought to clarify for the record, and for the <br />benefit of the residents in the audience and other members of the <br />public, exactly what impact not taking the federal money would <br />have, and reviewed her perceptions of those ramifications. <br />9. Consider Fire Station #L• Mold Removal, Basic Renovation <br />of the Basement, Usage by Roseville Affiliated Groups <br />Public Works Director Duane Schwartz reviewed background <br />information for Fire Station # 1 and its use for various purposes <br />over the last 50+ years. Mr. Schwartz noted that, over the last <br />few years, the basement had experienced water infiltration <br />problems during heavy rains, with resulting water damage to <br />some storage areas, and mold issues identified. The Institute for <br />Environmental Assessment had performed an air quality <br />assessment of the building, and the staff report dated June 21, <br />2004 included their report detailing the extent of the mold <br />Consider Fire <br />Station #1: Mold <br />Removal, Basic <br />Renovation of the <br />Basement, Usage by <br />Roseville Affiliated <br />Groups <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.