My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0719_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0719_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 3:51:16 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:43:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting— 07/12/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 3 <br />Councilmembers and upper level employees perform the <br />evaluation. <br />Mayor Klausing concurred with Councilmember Ihlan's <br />comments, suggesting that among employees, only Department <br />Heads, Assistant Department Heads, and or their equivalent <br />(Division Directors) be considered as participants in the <br />evaluation. <br />Councilmember Kough suggested that constituent comment be <br />sought related to the City Manager's timely response to their <br />inquiries andlor concerns. <br />There was not Council consensus on Councilmember Kough's <br />suggestion for constituent comment, with Mayor Klausing <br />noting that the City Council was continually receiving feedback <br />from constituents, as direction was provided to staff, as to <br />whether the directives were being achieved. Mayor Klausing <br />cautioned that a"citizen survey" evaluation may not prove an <br />accurate and effective evaluation tool. <br />Councilmember Schroeder concurred with Mayor Klausing's <br />comments, noting that the City Council needed to channel <br />citizen comment through their evaluations. <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the number of City of <br />Roseville employees (150); how to maintain the anonymity of <br />completed evaluations; and Data Practices protection; <br />consistency of the forms used; and applicable standards for <br />evaluation. <br />There was Council consensus that the evaluation be performed <br />by the Department Heads, Assistant Department Heads, <br />Division Managers as applicable, along with the City Council <br />individually. <br />City Attorney Anderson recommended that an individual <br />Councilmember or a Paralegal or Law Clerk in the City <br />Attorney's office serve as the designated recipient of completed <br />evaluations, serve to distribute them to the City Council as a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.