My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0726_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0726_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 3:34:23 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:43:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
289
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />DATE: 7/26/04 <br />ITEM NO.: 3 j <br />Department Approval: Manager Reviewed: Agenda Section: <br />'�,�/ <br />�I <br />Item Description: Applewood Pointe Public Street Open to Traffc <br />Consent <br />Background: The residents of Orchard Ridge at Applewood are scheduled to start moving in to <br />their new homes during the first week of August. One of the conditions for construction of the <br />Applewood Pointe Development was that the construction traffic not access County Road C-2. <br />Since the start of construction last summer, there has been a fence across Arona Street limiting <br />access into the Applewood Pointe development to two areas; the first being through the JLT <br />parking lot to the south, the second being through the new Terrace Drive Extension out to <br />Hamline Avenue. Until now Arona Street has been closed to thru traffic. As discussed during <br />plan development, the thru access between County Road C-2 and Hamline Avenue is vital to <br />---, <br />eme_r�er�y vehicles and traffic operations for this development. Since residents will be moving <br />in, it would appear that it is time to open up Arona Street for public use. <br />In preparation for this, we have completed an intersection analysis for each of the new public <br />street intersections. We have attached a memo discussing the findings of this analysis and what <br />we recommend for traffic control. We wanted to have the Council review these <br />recommendations. <br />Policy Objectives: For all stop controlled intersections, it is engineering practice to perform a <br />warrant analysis consistent with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device (MUTCD). This <br />is an industry standard and assists decisions makers in evaluating intersections objectively. We <br />have performed warrant analysis on each of the intersections in the new development and have <br />attached them to this council action. The consequences for installing a stop sign that does not <br />meet warrants can be as follows: <br />• Excessive sign usage breeds disrespect for ALL traffic signs - If a motorist perceives a stop <br />sign as not serving any useful purpose (i.e. no or little cross-traffic to justify stopping), their <br />respect for the sign and the officials approving and installing the signs is significantly <br />diminished. Stop signs become part of the landscape, or an every day feature, and their <br />effectiveness is reduced. <br />• Unacceptable levels of stop sign non-compliance - Based on stop sign compliance studies <br />conducted at intersections where all-way stop control was installed but not warranted based on <br />traffic volumes, an average of 30% of the motorists approaching the intersection do not come <br />to a complete stop. In general, if people see no reason for the sign they pay no attention to it. <br />• Potential safety hazard to pedestrians and other motorists - Disregard and disrespect of <br />stop signs by the motorist decreases safety. Pedestrians are often lured into a false sense of <br />security by the stop sign by assuming the motorists will stop. Young children who are brought <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.