My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0726_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0726_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 3:34:23 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:43:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
289
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session — 07/19/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 8 <br />school parking lot. Mr. Beets estimated that forty percent Elementary School <br />(40%) of the project costs would be born by the School <br />District, with the remainder paid from funds in the City's <br />storm water replacement fund. <br />Councilmember Schroeder advised that he had requested <br />discussion on the proposed project, as the construction and <br />engineering costs did not calculate correctly on the draft <br />agreement provided in the Council packet, and he sought <br />clarification from staff as to actual costs. <br />Public Works Director Duane Schwartz noted that the forty <br />percent (40%) was an estimate at this time until final <br />construction costs were completed, at which time further <br />review would assign the actual cost to the School District <br />for their portion of the cost share. <br />Councilmember Schroeder requested that the proposed <br />agreement, specifically Items 2, 3, 4 and 5, be better <br />defined in the agreement so both parties were clear as to the <br />cost share and future maintenance and replacement <br />responsibilities. <br />Mr. Schwartz noted that the costs were reflected up to the <br />edge of the School's property line, and that the main line <br />was the responsibility, for maintenance and replacement, of <br />the City. <br />John Goedeke, 2674 Virginia Avenue <br />Mr. Goedeke noted, for historical reference, that when the <br />original building was constructed at the HANC, there was a <br />drainage issue; further impacted by housing built adjacent <br />to the HANC, allowing for only minor corrections to be <br />provided. <br />Councilmember Schroeder noted that he was not against <br />the project, but was simply requesting that the agreement <br />outline a fair project cost-share to both parties. <br />Maschka moved, Kough seconded, approval of an <br />agreement between the City of Roseville and the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.