2004_0726_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

4.9 The submitted plan set includes a storm water management design that proposes one catch basin in the parking lot and a pipe connection from the roof drain to the proposed storm water management pond. This proposal requires the review and approval of the Grass Lake Water Management Organization and the Public Works Department of the City of Roseville. 4.10 Substantial grading of the western half of the parcel will occur to accommodate the parking lot, worship center, and storm water managementpond. Similarto the storm water management plan, the proposed grading will require the review and approval of the Department of Public Works. 5.0 REVIEW of CONDITIONAL, USE PERMIT: 5.1 Section 1013.01 requires the City to consider the following criteria when reviewing a Conditional Use Permit: a. Impact on traffic b. Impacts on parks, streets and other public facilities c. Compatibility of the site plan, internal circulation, landscaping and structure with contiguous properties d. Impact of the use on market value of contiguous properties e. Impact on the general public health, safety and welfare f. Compatibilitywith the City's Comprehensive Plan 5.3 Permitted Uses. The City Planner has reviewed the proposed improvementsto the existing church and concludedthe proposal meets these criteria. Specifically,the construction of a new worship center, expanded lobby and new restrooms are permitted in an R-1 District by issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. 5.4 Traffic. Though adding traffic to neighboring streets (Grandview Avenue, Lovell Avenue, and Chatsworth Street, the added traffic will not be a sub stantial increase to that which is currently impacting these streets. Further, the traffic generated by the church is typically off peak and usually on weekends, such as Saturday evenings and Sunday mornings. Traffic counts on such neighborhood streets typically peak at less than 4,� trips per day, most at less than 2,000. This compareswith the 6,300trips on County Road B-2 near Chatsworth. The proposed additions will not create significant additional traffic nor the need for additional public facilities. The City traffic consultant (ShortElliott Hendrickson) completed a review of the Real Life proposal and concluded that the traffic generated by the proposal will be relatively small except for the peak period on Sundays, when traffic on local streets is usually at its lowest daytime volume. However, the consultant did provide comment and direction on solving an interior circulation problem that is supported by the City Staff (please see attached letter). PF3583_RCA_072604 Page 3 of 6