2004_1025_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF CITY COUNCII, CITY OF ROSEVILLE RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Pursuant to due ca11 and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Ha11 in said City on Monday, the 25th day of October, 2004, at 6:30 p.m. The followingmembers were present: and the followingwere absent: none. Councilperson Mastel introduced and moved the adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITYREPORTS ON IMPROVEMENTS FOR NEIGHBORHOODS 19, 22, and 32 WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed the street construction needs of various neighborhoods in the City and has tentatively selected neighborhoods for inclusion in the 2004 PavementManagementProgram; and WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve that portion of the City of Roseville described below by one or more of the following installations: bituminous paving, concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer, bituminous overlay, and necessary appurtenances, and to assess the bene�ited property for a11 or a portion of the cost of the improvementpursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.011 to 429111: NEIGHBORHOOD NUMBERS AND DESCRIPTIONS Nei hborhood Street From To 19/22 S. Owasso Boulevard Rice Street 3200 West RR Crossin 32 Chatsworth Street Grandview Lovell Lovell Ave Chatsworth cu1- de- sac NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota as follows: The neighborhoods speciiied in the attached drawing are hereby approved for inclusion in the 2005 Pavement ManagementProgram. 2. The proposed improvements are referred to the City Engineer for study and she is instructed to report to the Council with a11 convenient speed, advising the Council in a preliminaryway as to whether they should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvements, and the estimated cost of the improvements as recommended. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilperson Maschka and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereoi and the followingvoted againstthe same: none.